English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What would be the benefit of man loosing their tail? If it wasn't beneficial why did monkeys develop a tail in the first place? Ah ha answer that one for me you heathen Atheist? Kisses BB

2007-06-02 16:42:31 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

36 answers

And just where do you think our tailbones came from.

2007-06-02 16:46:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Is it really that difficult to tell the difference between apes and monkeys? Apes are the ones without a tail. Humans are apes. Sometimes humans are born with a tail. These babies used to be declared spawn of satan and murdered; now we just get rid of the tail. Isn't science - and sanity - great?

2016-04-01 12:42:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To evolutionists, would you consider yourself to have descended from the monkeys? And you have features of a monkey? Can God not make different species out of primates, man one of them? Some species have tails and others don't.

Why are there just few species between man (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Family Cebidae) as compared to tens of thousand kinds among insects?

Man may differ in color of the skin, shape of the head, nose, lips, eyes, height, weight, tone of voice, penmanship, moles, birth marks, talents, etc., but still, we belong to one species. God must have made us different to distinguish one from another. How would it be had God made us look the same as a fish like a snapper, or an insect like a butterfly, or a bird like the hummingbird? What would differentiate us from millions of us? I believe in creation and God created a monkey to be a monkey with tail and man as a human being without the tail (at the end of the vertebrae is what is called tail bone but it does not mean that it is a remnant of evolution from monkey).

2007-06-02 17:49:44 · answer #3 · answered by Peace Crusader 5 · 2 1

Another one evolutionist can't answer is why are there still monkeys and such spices still in existence? Oh, and if that were the case then why aren't there any half human half ape's ruining around some where? Oh, and how did the big bag ocker? And if it was debris that cause a planet to form and some how create intelligent life then where did that dust and debris come from? SO MANY QUESTIONS NEVER TO BE ANSWERED WITH OUT RUNNING INTO MORE QUESTIONS ... AND THEY ARE NOT ANSWERED EITHER! so on this note, please try to defend evaluation now. This is not a threat, just a request for some people to prove themselves wrong about what they believe.

2007-06-02 16:59:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

For the record... we DO have a tailbone.

Please do your own reserach before you embarrass us creationists further.

However, let me also be the first to state that a 1-inch "tail" does not prove unequivocally that we evolved from monkeys. Alligators and birds have tails too; that doesn't mean they came from monkeys.

2007-06-02 16:50:28 · answer #5 · answered by ATWolf 5 · 4 0

Most monkeys with tails are actually simians, not apes - the latter is the ones we evolved from....they dont have tails either. They have a coccyx, just like us, and on occasion a throw back gene in humans will show up, and lo and behold, a baby IS born with a stub of a tail, just like a chimp. They are promptly surgically removed for obvious reasons.

2007-06-02 16:49:35 · answer #6 · answered by freshbliss 6 · 2 2

Actually the Tail Bone is the remnant of the tail. And some people are actually born with a very small tail that is removed at birth.

2007-06-02 16:51:46 · answer #7 · answered by islandsigncompany 4 · 1 3

No you didn't get us. YOU might have evolved from a monkey, but I did not.
We have proof of our one time tail still upon our bodies - it's called a tail bone, for good reason. Google search images of it and actually look at it sometime. As man walks on two feet and upright now, he no longer has need of the tail. MONKEYS have tails because of they environment which they chose and thus evolved for, same as why gorillas do not have them, and are big and dark of fur. Environmental. Like brown people to white people...

heathens and Atheists are two separate factions.

2007-06-02 16:45:42 · answer #8 · answered by Edhelosa 5 · 3 4

You probably know that humans still have a tail, and you yourself still have 4 tail bones. This is probably an attempt to ridicule theists who don't have the brain power to realize that. Good one, guy. You get points for that laugh at theists.

2007-06-02 16:59:53 · answer #9 · answered by Fred 7 · 1 2

What really gets me is the amount of Ignorance you're willing to display.

My understanding of the Theory of Man's Evolution is that our ancestors were APE-like, not monkeys. Apes don't have tails.

2007-06-02 16:50:48 · answer #10 · answered by Champion of Knowledge 7 · 1 3

Sorry... I'm a believer who also believes in Darwinian evolution.... gotta come down with the secularists on this one.

There are TONS of apes and monkeys born without tails... and there are people born every year with tiny prehensile tails coming off their spines.

My ex wife had an extra two vertebre in her spine.... of course she was the freakin devil.... not a monkey.

2007-06-02 16:49:13 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers