Jesus of Nazereth or darwin?
They both contradict each other.
Darwin says only the fittest survive while Jesus of Nazereth says the meek shall inherit the earth.
Looks like in the long run darwin is wrong.Will evolutionist fundies ever admit they are wrong?
.
.
2007-06-02 15:32:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
evolution by God
2007-06-02 15:35:48 · answer #1 · answered by zee zee 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Christians are meek? How many people have died under Christianity? If you want to see meek, go to Tibet and see the Buddhists there that get pushed around and killed since they don't believe in fighting back...
your reason for evolution being false made no sense at all. Evolutionists (if that's even a word) don't all agree on everything Darwin said. He's the man who got the idea of evolution popularized. His idea of natural selection is the base of evolution. Evolution is taking place right now! How can you deny that? Another thing, Islam is increasing drastically because they are not meek, the are forcing their religion upon many people (not everywhere) and will soon pass christianity in numbers.
2007-06-02 22:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by bob888 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darwin was exploring genetics, Jesus was communicating spiritual psychology. No connection.
They do not contradict each other. The fittest survive in nature but full consciousness holds the trump card for our species. We are still evolving. The 'meek shall inherit the earth' is only one of the psychological attributes he speaks of in the Sermon on the Mount - all are required for full aliveness and return to 'being.' As he demonstrated only ego death (body level symbol) is the ticket to heaven in the here and now.
2007-06-02 22:44:54 · answer #3 · answered by MysticMaze 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The meek are inheriting the earth, ONLY in the human population.
How often do you see a 3 legged deer?
Humans encourage the growth of the stupid, Society takes care of those things that hurt people, a bridge looks dangerous, we post a guard to defend them so people don't cross them. We have warning labels such as Caution: Hot Coffee. This is the reason Darwin doesn't work in the human population.
However we have the capability to destroy ourselves, which will allow Darwinian evolution to continue working, hence the weak still eliminate themselves.
2007-06-02 22:39:32 · answer #4 · answered by angothoron 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure if you know a lot about Darwin, but he was a religious man. He suffered for many years over what impact his findings might have on Christianity. He only went public because another scholar had came up with a similar idea, and so he was pushed to publicize to get the credit for his work (he was reluctant). I can see the first part of your question being valid, but why try to make others believe as you do?
2007-06-02 22:39:33 · answer #5 · answered by cajuncalli 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say they both have understanding in their own field. Jesus, knew people and what they wanted and what they had to deal with in life. Darwin understood how evolution changed the world and how animals adapted to the environment. You are trying to compare apples to oranges. It wont work. The two have nothing to do with the other.
2007-06-02 22:38:46 · answer #6 · answered by punch 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus would crush the meek should they challenge his rule. Luke 19:27
2007-06-02 22:35:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They are both right to a point. Jesus was the one with the deeper message.
2007-06-02 22:44:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darwin repented in the end.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-06-02 22:39:18 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
meek shall inherit the earth, is kind of a contradiction isn't it?
2007-06-02 22:35:18 · answer #10 · answered by rogue chedder 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They do not have too. The fool has said in heart there is no God; but saying it does not make it so.
2007-06-02 22:39:17 · answer #11 · answered by I Wanna Know 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋