Creationists, if you don't believe the Theory of Evolution, why do you spend so much time trying to disprove

Question

Shouldn't your proposal, the Creationism, win over as the dominant theory because of all the evidence you have?

Answer 1

I like this question

Answer 2

Creationists don't have a theory, they have a belief that God created everything, and that belief is based on faith that the Bible is true and is the inspired Word of God. There is no way to prove it, other than emphasizing the logic that a newborn baby, or a rose, or the all of the beauty of nature could not possibly be just a random occurrance which is not controlled by anything superior to us. How can everything work together so perfectly so as to keep us, or a dog, or the universe functioning, on just a random basis? We don't spend time trying to disprove the theory of evolution, nor do we waste time trying to prove that God created our universe. To us, it's obvious, but neither view can be proved.

Answer 3

Aren't you contradicting your own question?

How about the theory of evolution. If it has enough evidence, then shouldn't all human being believe in it? Oh wait, it is just a theory. Have you read "the Orgin of Species"? Do you think Darwin gives you enough evidences and tests to prove his theory 100%? What people try to do in today's society is that they believe a theory is enough to disprove god. How funny. I understand people are still researching and there are many sutudies out there, but non which can prove the theory enough. I don't believe in God that general public believes, but I don't believe everything that Darwin said either. Even on his intro, he mentions it would be normal for him to make mistake on his writings.

Answer 4

since there is a separation between church and state, any theory attached to a religion will not be taught as science. at the very least the THEORY of evolution takes as much faith as creation. ask yourself this, ape before man, a fish crawled out of the ocean and walked, bacteria turned into a life form, the big bang ,whatever. but nothing comes from nothing. even if you believe evolution something had to create something, right?dont put your faith in science. science knew for a FACT the earth was flat, and the sun revolved around the earth, and that was only a few hundred years ago, out how ever many thousands of years man has been here. what will science know for sure 200 years from now that is different from what we know as fact today?

Answer 5

I'm an Atheist but I think they spend so much time disproving Evolution because they're afraid. They don't want to be confronted with the fact that their God and everything they believe in may be false. When you actually study Evolution (which I doubt many of them have) the evidence for it crushes the theory of Creation. They don't want to admit it and they also don't want to see the power their religion holds in America to diminish so they constantly make sure that themselves and other Christians continue believing in Creation. The last thing they want to become is a science-loving heathen.

Answer 6

Your question contradicts itself

Of course the Creationists would disprove evolution, since they don't believe in evolution

Answer 7

i'm undecided what you're asking approximately, you do no longer look to have written any ideas on your question, only links to uncredible sites. My answer to what you have asked nonetheless, is not any, if it relatively is argued then there is not any longer sturdy adequate data for it. additionally you will word, there is not any such ingredient as medical fact, in basic terms cutting-edge thought. multiple issues have been assumed for years via scientests, then somebody comes alongside and proves it incorrect, think of dazzling back to issues alongside with "the earth is flat" or "the Earth is the middle of the universe", till they're relatively shown, they are able to't be declared fact. Oh additionally, i think of you recommend creation scientists, no longer creationists. they're many times non secular scientists who, for his or her faith, factor out flaws in theories that oppose their ideals. permit's be trustworthy nonetheless, if all scientists only assumed, whilst Christopher Columbus back to Europe he could have been burnt at a stake for disagreeing with technological know-how in asserting he'd discovered data the international wasn't flat. If creation scientists are incorrect, then sooner or later it relatively is going to likely be shown, til then it relatively is the unknow.

Answer 8

Once again, let's get one thing clear: Evolutionists and Creationists have the SAME evidence. The difference lies in a matter of interpretation.

As ONE example, take the Geologic Column. Evolutionists say this proves evolution as the complexity of the organisms increases up the strata. Creationists say that the flood accounts for this, since the more advanced creatures will survive longer and therefore be deposited at a higher strata. Additionally, where are those supposed millions of transitional forms that will prove that one set of animals at a lower strata gradually evolved into another set of advanced animals at a higher strata?

So, when you talk about evidence, remember that cuts both ways.

Edit : 9 minutes after I posted my answer, and I already got 3 thumbs down. So, evolutionists cannot take an intelligent challenge to their monkey tail tale. And just for the record, there is no THEORY of evolution, not scientifically.

Answer 9

I think that perhaps a better question might be - If the Christians want to spend so much time attempting to show that evolution is "just a theory", why will they not at least learn a little bit about it? The argument of "if we came from monkeys why are there still monkeys" shows willful ignorance of the subject matter. You would think they would want to know at least something of evolution so they could make a cohesive argument against it.

Answer 10

Since when has humanity embraced truth whenever they found it? Your theory (creationism would win over) is based on faulty logic.

No, today's popular "truth" is humanism and all its dogmas based on the false assertion that there is no God.

Popularity is no test of truth.

Answer 11

I had not noticed that much time was devoted to it. Science is good but much of evolution is only conjecture that can neither be proved or disproved.