Global warming skeptics, can you help me please?

Question

Can you help me out with this?

ExxonMobil are offering $10,000 (plus expenses) to scientists and economists who refute the latest IPCC report on climate change. http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2004397,00.html

All I need is some reliable evidence to refute global warming.

There's money to be made here so please come up with some good evidence.

Answer 1

I am a skeptic about global warming because it is an inconvenient theory, just like evolution in a theory, there is still no hard evidence on its truthfulness enough to prove that it will happen, I believe that it is a natural earth cycle for the earth to make changes, for example an ice age or whatever, but the fact that it is so inconvenient and still just a theory has led me to become a skeptic. I do not want to change my way of life for a theory and if anyone else wants to clean the environment or whatever thats great, but I still think we should get some proof before we reevaluate the economy and restrict capitalism by making restricting laws on oil and pollution.

Answer 2

Ask yourself why Exxon would do this.
http://www.exxposeexxon.com/facts/deniers.html
Exxon is one of the biggest, sole contributors and therefore have the most to lose when global warming evidence is substantiated. Exxon have been paying scientists to sway reports in their favor for decades. The man on the Bush Administration was found doctoring the reports to downplay global warming facts. Guess where he's working now? Exxon. In other words, many people are working for Exxon 'under the table'. Incidentally, Exxon had still not paid the fisherman who lost money due to Exxon's oil spill in the 80's. Throwing out $10,000 is like offering a couple pennies to them. Ask yourself, why?

Answer 3

Exxon-Mobil = $16 million among 43 groups in the 8 years covering 1998 to 2005

Union of Concerned Scientists = $12 million in 2004 alone.

Big oil companies do fund some global warming research big environmental companies also fund global warming research.
If you are concerned with unbiased science why don't you look where your science is coming from, ask a question like why is the Union of concerned scientists, a big alternative energy corporation front group, funding pro global warming research.

And by the way ExxonMobil does not even fund any global warming science anymore, they gave it up. Only these so called front groups fund the research.

Whenever an oil company funds research it causes a huge outcry, but when an alternative energy company or carbon credit company funds research it is hailed as a model of unbiased research.
Global warming is big business, New Zealand alone spent nearly 1 billion dollars on carbon offsets in the past 2 years.

Answer 4

Most of the skeptics aren't claiming that there is no global warming. The ones I am familiar with say that there IS global warming and humans DO contribute in much the same way as you contribute to local flooding when you take a swim in a lake. Yes you make the water level go up, but getting out will not stop the flooding.

I heard one skeptic describe man's contribution to global warming as analogous to "farting in a hurricane" .... So I guess you would maintain that if you stopped farting, that would stop the hurricane??

Answer 5

I do not believe it is totally man's fault for global warming. We are coming out of an ice age.
Volcanoes, forest fires all contribute and these are not all man made.

We can be good citizens and conserve energy and resources, try not to pollute the atmosphere but will this really stop global warming?

No one knows.....it is not the end of the world.

Answer 6

Trevor, I merely have not seen convincing data that worldwide warming is genuine. In doing examine, I certainly have got here upon that those climate cycles have got here approximately interior the previous, long formerly SUV's, jet airliners, etc. The severity of the California wildfires are a right away effect of no longer permitting human beings to clean lifeless flowers for thier land. That will advance the gasoline load so while a hearth does commence, it has extra gasoline to burn. extra gasoline equates to extra smoke, co2 and each little thing else that contributes to this alledged worldwide warming. So in a feeling, you're good. guy does reason worldwide warming while he does stupid stuff like permitting extra factors to burn needlessly. decrease the gasoline load and you will decrease the quantity of poisonous gasses interior the air. The fires heavily isn't as severe and that they are going to be less demanding to incorporate. The Kyoto protocol is large aside from one ingredient; the biggest polluters interior the worldwide, China and India, are given a bypass while it contains emissions controls. If we can clean up our air, then all of us ought to do their section as best as they might. it is equality. as far as Oxfam (notwithstanding the hell it is), your fact says all of it; climate cycle. through actuality guy has basically been recording climate events for the final a hundred twenty five years or so, who can somewhat say what the climate became like say in the process the Rennaisance era, the Roman Empire, the rule of thumb of the Pharoahs or the like and use it as a assessment to todays climate. Get genuine. For all all of us be attentive to, snowboarding became large in Switzerland in 1532. don't be attentive to, through fact no person ever recorded the severe and occasional temps for the day.

Answer 7

I live in Maine now, USA. Last winter was an absolutely strictly average winter in terms of degree day heating fuel demand compared to the past 30 years. Even though the winter was normal, I found because of the rise of the cost of heating fuels that my personal winter was colder than normal.

Exxon Mobil's profits are indeed proof that global warming can be curbed and is in fact nonexistent. I guess they're doing the best they can, with their profit margins, to promote global cooling!

Answer 8

“Anyway, if you "smell oil", perhaps it is because we were told too many times that if someone is against anthropogenic GHG he is 'one of them, one of the bad guys'. The climate community turned many of us into paranoids. You smell oil everywhere even where there is no drop of it. The difference between us, though, is that my research led me to change my preconceptions, so I am not gullible to the propaganda I hear (and I admit I used to be before stumbling into the field).” Astrophysicist, Nir Shaviv,

Answer 9

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id=