Fool. "There is no respect of persons with God".
We all are one. So far it's notably "one proselyte".
Perhaps your ignorance makes atheism popular.
The objective is NOT to "believe", but to "know".
Devils "believe": James 2:19
Believe not: Matthew 24:23,26; 1John 4:1
Know the truth makes you free of believe lies(laws).
Christ(the end of the law) is our "peace", not our war.
The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.
2007-06-02 03:10:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd rather be with the better person, whether that be the atheist or the believer would clearly depend on the individual.
the first cannibal would probably be the one with a weaker stomach and possibly less resolve- this has little to do with religion when you consider it. (unless, possibly, you're a scientologist?)
The believer would be most likely to give up hope first, just given the fact that they aren't receiving the help they believed "god" should have given them. I think I'd prefer the atheist if i had to say knowing nothing about either, I wouldn't want to hear loud prayers and bible-bashing while trapped in a life-boat with someone.
2007-06-02 10:00:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by jess 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Atheist, Atheist, Believer. The believer will surely share first all that they have but the believer would probably lose hope first since atheist don't believe in a supreme being. I would rather be in a boat with atheist for the fact that I would have one last chance to convince them of my GOD and he does exist.
2007-06-02 10:05:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by woodstockb42001 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Try it and find out.
You never know how someone will behave based on only your prejudices against the person.
Some atheists have more ethical behavior than some believers. Some believers do not have as much faith in themselves as atheists.
2007-06-02 09:48:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lu 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I want Atheists,because if cannibalism becomes necessary I don't want some Christian idjit throwing the food overboard to save our souls. And I want people who will dedicate all their energies to things that help survival,without wasting time on useless duties like praying. Plus I don't want to spend possibly the last months of my life dealing with some religious zealot trying to save my soul. These people are irrational enough under normal circumstances,can you imagine how nuts they would get in that situation?
AD
2007-06-02 09:50:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Im a pastor but i prefer atheists on my boat if it will sink
researchers tested 377 patients and found out that the people who died first where the ones who were being prayed for by their family
God bless. Amen!
2007-06-02 09:44:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I would definitely prefer to with an atheist in that case.
Survival would be so much more important to the atheist. There would be probably a greater chance of getting through it.
And the conversation would probably be a bit better.
2007-06-02 09:47:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
The believer would be unbelievably boring, if he was a fundie. The believer would be the first to break down and eat me. Why? Without his pastor to tell him what is right and what is wrong he would resort to his heathen ways. The atheist knows they can rely only on themselves. The atheist has common sense to know right from wrong, they don't have to go to church to learn it.
2007-06-02 09:51:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
Cannibalism shouldn't be strange to Christians. I would want people in the boat who had morals, not just laws.
2007-06-02 09:53:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Voyager 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
So far, I've read in bible that believers have done all that.
And I've also seen some modern cannibalism in crime and news, mostly they involve strong christians in such category.
So when it comes to drowning babies, killing the neighbors, destroying the nations... Believers rank #1.
2007-06-02 09:45:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by X Theist 5
·
1⤊
1⤋