Are you agree that it is the right time to take a oath for planting atleast five plantation with the name of newly born baby to prevent the global warming.
2007-06-02 01:07:00 · 6 answers · asked by muchukund 2 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
U have asked a million$ question.
True very true.
If this is made possible then we would have planted 3.29 billion in one year.
that a great news only if possible.
2007-06-02 01:39:10 · answer #1 · answered by Auralist 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would certainly help. One of the contributory factors to global warming is deforestation and anything that reverses the trend will have a positive benefit.
You can actually plant a large number of trees for very minimal cost so it needn't be expensive, it can cost as little as $0.10 to plant a tree.
It wouldn't be possible to prevent global warming just by planting trees. Trees can sequester a lot of crabon dioxide from the atmosphere through the process of photosynthesis, a good healthy tree in the Tropics will sequester 3 to 5 tons of CO2 in it's lifetime. There are other gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect including methane and nitrous oxide, whilst smaller in quantity than CO2 they are more harmful per unit volume. Removing all the anthropogenic (manmade) CO2 will certainly go a long way to helping but it won't eliminate the problem altogether.
2007-06-02 08:45:56 · answer #2 · answered by Trevor 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I get 100 weeds everytime the wind blows..annual plants do their share too
I say reduce the size of Government..the temp has only raised 1 degree the last 100 years..
find something that benefits supply and demand of the goods and services you love to consume.
stop thinking Man is something greater or even has the ability to control nature..you are only responsible for yourself..
this Sophomore-ish hysteria is getting old..it's like a Brittany Spears daily update coming from the media.
.it's all freaking hype..affording you some delusion of grandeur via association with people that have been indoctrinated like you.. that pretty much all come exclusively from the public sector projecting themselves as being enlightened..
2007-06-02 08:25:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2007-06-02 08:15:09 · answer #4 · answered by Michael N 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you enlist the help of Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi in this waste of time. Neither of them seem to have much to do of any importance.
2007-06-02 08:16:40 · answer #5 · answered by missingora 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO... I don't agree.. why would you assume that I do?
2007-06-02 08:16:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋