SOUNDS LIKE ANOTHER FLAKY BOOK BY VERY QUESTIONABLE PEOPLE WHO WROTE TO SCROUNGE UP A FEW BUCKS TO BUY SOMETHING FOR THEIR HABIT SO THE ANSWER IS YES YOU JUST TOLD ME
2007-06-01 18:14:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by andrew_zito 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your thereapist probably first heard of it inthfiction work :"DaVinci Code'. This 'gospel of Michael' was written long after the NT gospels - the person who wrote 'Michael' was not an eyewithness. It was also reviewed and rejected by the early church (NOT by Constantinople).
It is a rejected 'gnostic' writing and the OT and NT teach against gnosticism - which holds that matter is evil and spirit is good...a lot of other stuff in 'Michael' is so different an inconsistent with the other eye-witness that it was reviewed and rejected as being a fabrication.
2007-06-02 01:19:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Richard of Fort Bend 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm going to answer this question with a question:
What have you done to research the validity of the "Gospel of Michael?"
Just because someone says something or writes something doesn't make it true.
-When was this book supposedly first written?
-What scholarly evidence do we have to lead conclusively to Michael as the author?
-How far back does the manuscript date that the "gospel" was retrieved from.
-Are there any other historical evidences that lead historians to believe it was in circulation at the supposed time of it's arrival on scene? (i.e. historians of the time referencing it, or anyone for that matter)
- Why do you believe this "gospel" over the other four gospels.
-what have you done to educate yourself on their origin?
Have reasons for what you believe... your therapist most definitely is not perfect. He didn't study theology, archeology, or for that matter educate himself on what he decided to take as gospel truth if he fed you this book.
It's a gnostic "gospel" and no new find.
2007-06-02 01:39:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No wonder humans supposedly found this book. I bet the ones who found this 'book'(quote unquote)are anti-Christ. I am glad God is not held hostage by this supposed book or your therapist. This is a prime example why the Word of God says that we each should study (the Bible) to shew ourselves approved. So that when some Joe Blow comes to us with anything that we know is a lie we can simply dismiss it. May God Bless U.
2007-06-02 01:15:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey watch out! The next thing you know your therapist is going to try to sell you beach front property in Nevada. If they told you the same thing about Abraham Lincoln what would you say about your therapist? Don't you know that Lincoln was a flying Indian vegetarian that hated grapes?
Check your sources.
2007-06-02 01:16:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Today is the Day 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe God has protected His Word for thousands of years. During the Dark Ages the devil tried to destroy all Scriptures! If I were Satan, I'd write a book like Michael, too!
2007-06-02 01:14:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You put this up and provide no evidence to support you, not even a link to something that would at least give you some credibility? Right now, I have to believe that the liar is you.
At least some of the other people that "try" to disprove the Bible put up ONE link. There's nothing even remotely true about this question.
2007-06-02 01:14:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jason P 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Be very careful what you believe, for your eternal life is at stake, there are many false books / gnostic writtings, false prophets, false teachers / preachers, false religions ! !
Don't believe everything you hear in the world! !
But test everything by the word of God! !
We have the Bible as a standard for the Truth of God.
Beware lest you be deceived! !
,,,,,,,,,,,
kay
2007-06-02 01:17:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by kay 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh my goodness, you believe that stuff? It is so stupid. Jesus was NOT married, Mary was a virgin, the apostles were NOT gay , Jesus did die, He died for ME and YOU...And on and on...This is just craziness.
2007-06-02 01:13:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by JesusLovesMe! 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Its fuuny to me how some say I dont beilive it, but if it was put in the Bible they would. How is that any diffrent from Luke or Johns books.
2007-06-02 01:16:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by ShiKobe 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, don't be so gullible. The Bible has been studied by Christian and non-Christian Scholars for a long long time and found to be historically accurate.
2007-06-02 01:13:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by Makemeaspark 7
·
2⤊
0⤋