English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The national academy of scientists are 90% Atheists

Do you know more about the origin of life than the top scientists?

Do you know more about how cars were manufactured than the top mechanics?

2007-06-01 14:37:33 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

No - No and No. So?

Cheers :-)

2007-06-01 14:41:58 · answer #1 · answered by chekeir 6 · 2 1

Thats 90%, theres still a 10% of non-atheists in there. And isnt science the same as a religion, it gives people hope that we arent just some mistake, that we are here either because an all powerful being created us or that everything is connected. The origin of life is a topic that we will prolly never know the answer to, through religion or science because every time we answer one question 10 more pop up in its place. And why do you have the question about cars in there, if anybody studied enough about a car they could learn just as much as the top mechanics.

2007-06-01 14:48:55 · answer #2 · answered by dogbagpipes 2 · 0 0

1. Depends on your definition of God. More scientists I am aware of believe in God than don't. It's easy to define your own God and then disprove it. Try defining one you can't disprove.

2. Logic dictates that any aethiest presumes to know more than any human who will ever exist. Just because someone at this point in time can't understand or conceive of how God (insert your own definition of God here) can exist, it doesn't mean that science won't one day. In the past people couldn't grasp how the world could be round, or how gravity could exist, or that the Earth is not the center of the universe.

Aethism simply put is a position of ignorance, it even denies the possibility that everything we experience in existence is a simulation. Who can prove it isn't? If you can prove it isn't than maybe you have a better argument for God not existing, but either is still possible.

2007-06-01 14:52:40 · answer #3 · answered by Jake Lockley 3 · 0 0

These are the same scientists who once told us the earth was flat and that the sun revolved around the earth, right? I believe they changed their minds.

Unfortunately, you and your scientist/mechanic friends will discover that you are 100% wrong and you will discover this when it is 100% too late to change your minds again.

Sadly, for you, in your attempt to discredit Christianity, you've actually provided a statistic that is biblical: 'Wide is the road that leads to distruction. Narrow is the gate that leads to eternal life and there are few that will enter in.'

So it looks like the 10% group is right where I want to be. You get a hardy, "AMEN!" from me!

2007-06-01 14:47:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Of course scientist want to have an answer for everything but not everything is immediately evident
Most scientist are blind to the ways of the Lord who is the highest form of truth. The empirical science are lower truths in order to benefit man not to replace God

2007-06-01 14:45:42 · answer #5 · answered by Gods child 6 · 0 0

Of course all the top scientist are atheist, that is why they make up all that stuff about evolution being the origin of life and that is why they became scientist. ty. for making that easy

2007-06-01 14:49:30 · answer #6 · answered by patrick m 2 · 0 0

Well little man they are only Athees until they try to disprove Christianity and then they change their minds.

Since my source about creation is the creator Himself then I would say, yes I know more then they do.

No, I have limited knowledge on how cars are manufactured.

2007-06-02 08:37:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The fact your reading out the daily mail tells me alot about your self, females will never be superior to men in science/engineering its what men created over hundreds of years, you barely read about women doing anything in history because its just that all they were doing is cooking, socialising and making babies, while men we're out trying to make more effective means of surviving over hundreds of years its going to account to some differences in the brain which can be seen all the time.

2016-05-18 23:57:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow! False analogy AND argument to authority.

False analogy: scientists have seen cars being built, they haven't seen one kind of animal evolve into another.

Argument to authority: And there are people who are just as good as scientists that reject evolution.

2007-06-01 14:48:27 · answer #9 · answered by Deof Movestofca 7 · 1 0

Even if your lame statements were true, (since you can't cite a source I'll go ahead and doubt them) I would have to answer by responding... evidently we must know more. Please peddle your junk somewhere you can say whatever you want and never have to cite a source or back up a claim. Here, your word just isn't good enough.

2007-06-01 14:44:56 · answer #10 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1 0

Yes, I know everything. You on the other hand should join modern civilization and put a shirt on.

2007-06-01 14:46:56 · answer #11 · answered by qwert 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers