English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Similar to today in many respects, although Mass was in Latin, and the "throwing open the doors" attitude of Vatican II was still four centuries away.

There were priests, bishops, popes, cardinals, vestments, sacraments, confessionals, pews, churches, basilicas, etc. just like today. The church changes slowly.

2007-06-01 08:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by evolver 6 · 0 0

a million. Missionaries 2. Crusaders 3. The Pope 4. The effect the Roman Empire left on maximum of its former territories 5. interior the previous due middle a protracted time the Spanish Empire replaced into the main excellent entity in Europe and that they have been religious Catholics. 6. The wanting by utilising the Europeans to withstand Islam.

2016-10-09 06:39:05 · answer #2 · answered by fullilove 4 · 0 0

As at all other times in history since the time of Christ, it was the sole repository and the sole preacher of the fullness of Christian truth, and the sole provider of the holy sacraments, the principle sources of grace Christ provided for His Church. It did have some serious administrative problems that required attention, especially the apparent conflict between fund raising for the purpose of constructing fitting places of worship for God, vs. the valid idea of spiritual benefits derived from almsgiving, and during the years following, such problems were rectified. Unfortunately a few proud men, no doubt frustrated by the state of affairs in the Church's administration, rebelled against God's Church and set up churches of their own based on unbiblical principles that were sure to result in ongoing conflict and division. We still see the fruit off that rebellion today, with thousands of conflicting, unauthorized, manmade denominational churches teaching partial truth and embroiled in doctrinal chaos, in open rejection of the stated will of God, "that they all may be ONE". In the meantime Christ's own Church continues, strong and pure, still teaching the fullness of truth and still providing the holy sacraments to His followers, as it will do until the end of time.

2007-06-01 08:46:33 · answer #3 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 1 2

Reactionary. They were trying to kill as many Reformers as possible. It was the first serious attempt at their total hegemony in centuries. They were certainly not prepared to let others weasel in on their racket.

2007-06-01 08:44:23 · answer #4 · answered by jonjon418 6 · 1 1

Guess it depended on where you were.

Little history the wars of reformation Catholic killed some Protestants, Protestants killed some Catholics. But mostly it was Protestant killing Protestant.

2007-06-01 08:43:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Happy that people had begun to make their meatballs for themselves; this meant they no longer had a dietary deficiency.

2007-06-01 08:51:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Unhappy that people had begun to read their Bibles for themselves; this meant they no longer had a theological monopoly.

2007-06-01 08:43:29 · answer #7 · answered by Soundtrack to a Nightmare 4 · 0 4

awful

2007-06-01 08:43:40 · answer #8 · answered by AliBaba 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers