English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Not the good things, i need the bad thing. not martin luther king, is martin luther. i think he did nothing wrong, but i need to write the bad thing,so if anyone has any idea just pose it ,please.

2007-06-01 07:53:37 · 11 answers · asked by sillystar 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

Well near the end of his life Martin Luther came to really hate the Jews, so he wrote a book called "On the Jews and Their Lies." This book was directly responsible for the Holocaust and centuries of discrimination and hatred against the Jews. Indeed Hitler named Martin Luther specifically as a hero, as did many of the Nazi leaders during the nuremburg trials. The protestant leaders officially said that Hitler was a hero in the exact same mold as Martin Luther.

Martin Luther claimed the Jews were blood vipers (he was one of the people who started the ridiculous blood libel crap), and he said, "We are at fault in not slaying them" to avenge Jesus.


Here are some quotes from that book:

"Therefore be on your guard against the Jews, knowing that wherever they have their synagogues, nothing is found but a den of devils in which sheer self-glory, conceit, lies, blasphemy, and defaming of God and men are practiced most maliciously and veheming his eyes on them."

"Moreover, they are nothing but thieves and robbers who daily eat no morsel and wear no thread of clothing which they have not stolen and pilfered from us by means of their accursed usury. Thus they live from day to day, together with wife and child, by theft and robbery, as arch-thieves and robbers, in the most impenitent security."

"but then eject them forever from this country. For, as we have heard, God's anger with them is so intense that gentle mercy will only tend to make them worse and worse, while sharp mercy will reform them but little. Therefore, in any case, away with them!"

"Over and above that we let them get rich on our sweat and blood, while we remain poor and they suck the marrow from our bones."


"My advice, as I said earlier, is:

First, that their synagogues be burned down, and that all who are able toss sulfur and pitch; it would be good if someone could also throw in some hellfire...

Second, that all their books-- their prayer books, their Talmudic writings, also the entire Bible-- be taken from them, not leaving them one leaf, and that these be preserved for those who may be converted...

Third, that they be forbidden on pain of death to praise God, to give thanks, to pray, and to teach publicly among us and in our country...

Fourth, that they be forbidden to utter the name of God within our hearing. For we cannot with a good conscience listen to this or tolerate it..."


"they remain our daily murderers and bloodthirsty foes in their hearts. Their prayers and curses furnish evidence of that, as do the many stories which relate their torturing of children and all sorts of crimes for which they have often been burned at the stake or banished."

"If I had power over the Jews, as our princes and cities have, I would deal severely with their lying mouth."

And so on... it's a pretty decent sized book, and the most vile, hateful and exceptionally evil thing you will ever, ever read. Martin Luther makes Charles Manson and Ed Gein look like Saints, and makes Hitler look like only a bastard son.

2007-06-01 07:58:19 · answer #1 · answered by Mike K 5 · 1 2

I'm not sure I understand your question, but I think you are asking what was bad about what Martin Luther did in the Reformation in terms of history.

I would say he did the best thing that could have happened. He exposed the church of the day for what they were really doing- adding things to their religion which were contrary to the Word of God. He started a whole movement back to the Bible.

I would be very careful if you are being told to write this paper by someone else. Seems like they aren't very well informed.

2007-06-01 07:58:10 · answer #2 · answered by MamaMia 4 · 1 1

Martin Luther challenged the self-imposed divine authority of the Pope and the Catholic church. He opposed the collection of money from the poor to build huge cathedrals and elaborate homes for the Bishops and Cardinals. He opposed the idea of chastity for priests and nuns. He opposed much of the Catholic dogma, stating that it had nothing to do with one's faith in God and Jesus.

Many Catholics agreed and left the Catholic church to follow Luther's teachings instead.

From the point of view of the Pope and other higher ups in the Catholic organization, this was bad.

2007-06-01 08:05:33 · answer #3 · answered by bikerchickjill 5 · 0 0

Well,

He split the Christian faith.

Where did that lead? There are now over 10,000 Christian denominations each interpreting the word of God to fit their own needs. I would say that is bad.

Sure the Catholic Church had some major problems back then and some of his criticism was justified, but he should have worked within the Church instead of letting it slip into thousands of different groups that can intentionally, or accidentally change the faith to meet their needs or wants.

There are many great Protestants, I am not bashing them. But the truth does not change with public opinion or with cultural whims.

Peace and God Bless you!

2007-06-01 08:00:18 · answer #4 · answered by C 7 · 0 1

You recognize, the whole lot I can suppose of is fairly now not some thing I'd remorse. My upbringing used to be a bit difficult. My mum and dad move to church, however it is form of a burden to them. A record of regulations. Growing up, the Bible used to be some thing they threw at us or bashed us over the pinnacle with. I take into account listening to a sermon as a young person approximately the Gospel being well information, and considering what that used to be approximately. They raised us to not have any outside dangerous conduct, however they on no account taught us any well method of handling our feelings. There's simplest goodbye you'll bottle anger and resentment earlier than they bubble to the skin, regardless of how a lot challenge you get into whilst it occurs. I had a difficulty of religion in my twenties, and what I ended up with used to be extra of a dating as an alternative than regulations situated faith. I nonetheless suppose the basics are major, however it is from the guts that well conduct flows - now not the opposite direction round. What I've struggled with is vengeance. I recognize I'm intended to depart matters in God's arms whilst anyone slights me. Part of me could love to retaliate. But fairly, forgiveness - although it is rough quick time period - is fairly bigger for me long run. There had been instances whilst I've suggestion approximately ditching my dating with my husband. Husbands may also be mightily intricate to manage a few days! But for the reason that of our dedication to God and every different, we have labored via the ones matters and feature come via more potent. There are instances whilst it kind of feels like plenty of labor. But it continually proves to be paintings valued at the trouble. I'm a bigger character for the reason that of my dating with God than I could had been with out it. It pushes me to develop and allow folks in, in which my upbringing taught me to not believe any person or something. In the top, if I'm fallacious, I nonetheless do not remorse it. The lifestyles I've lived is bigger (and I've been bigger for others) than I could had been in any other case. I suppose the folks who're real depressing of their religion (and there are a few!) are those who're serving out of a way of guilt or outside strain. When you make a decision it is what you desire, what you stop, does not look like a lot of a cost in any respect.

2016-09-05 19:01:13 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Sorry....I can't name one bad thing he did....

He exposed the heresy of the catholic church.....how is that a bad thing?

He believed in salvation by grace through faith....and not works......

He saw the rank idolatry within the system.......

Thank God for people like Martin Luther

2007-06-01 07:56:31 · answer #6 · answered by primoa1970 7 · 0 2

Bad Things About Martin Luther

2017-02-24 03:50:08 · answer #7 · answered by hostetter 4 · 0 0

If you are Catholic, starting the Protestant movement and disrespecting was probably considered a bad thing.

2007-06-01 07:58:00 · answer #8 · answered by New Dog Owner 4 · 1 1

For one he was a raving anti-Semite. Pull up some of his quotes on-line the man was just evil

2007-06-01 07:57:14 · answer #9 · answered by Quantrill 7 · 1 1

Spread hatred toward the Jews, that's a pretty big wrong.

2007-06-01 07:57:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers