English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It certainly couldn't have evolved from a monkey. Where oh where could it have evolved from? BB

2007-06-01 04:51:32 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

God I love all your answers keep me laughing please.

2007-06-01 06:37:07 · update #1

19 answers

Oh Betty......

First off, scientists are never going to find life outside the universe. I am fairly certain that the edge of the universe is way too far away for us to ever get there, and it's unlikely to have any windows or doors for us to leave through.

Secondly, although your question is interesting, it fails miserably to undermine the theory of evolution. Scientists would simply claim that any life found out in space evolved independently. No monkeys necessary.

2007-06-01 05:00:34 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

Evolution did not start from a monkey alone. Science have shown that life may have come from the smallest living particles or molecules which may have been the basis of the religions they called "dust" (hence the absence of exact words at the time of reporting the creation theory of the religions).
As life was also theorized that it might have come from the asteroids or meteors that eons ago have bombarded the earth can give us the possibility of life evolving from the same process as the lives from other planets. Do not qoute me, this is just my own guess work.

2007-06-01 05:06:24 · answer #2 · answered by Rallie Florencio C 7 · 1 0

I highly doubt they will find life outside our UNIVERSE,as by definition,the UNIVERSE is everything we can detect. Now,if we move along in our EDUCATION enough to understand the difference between A UNIVERSE and a solar system or galaxy before we try to debunk a theory we know nothing of,as we don't even quite comprehend what UNIVERSE means. Whether we find life on another planet has zero to do with evolution on earth. ZERO."IT" may be simply a microorganism,"IT" may not have intelligence. But "it" over "there" has nothing to do with evolution here. Please,before you try to disprove something,at least try to make sure you are at least grade school level educated in what it is you so desperately try to disprove. Really,why don't you actually try to LEARN about TOE?Then,at least,you will actually have a clue as to what it is you "don't want to be true so it is false"

2007-06-01 05:07:05 · answer #3 · answered by nobodinoze 5 · 1 0

Evolution doesn't say that we evolved from monkeys, only that we have a common ancestor.

Finding life outside of our universe wouldn't disprove anything regarding evolution on this planet.

Thanks for playing - now go read a book!

2007-06-01 04:54:55 · answer #4 · answered by Joe M 5 · 8 0

with out the context wherein Darwin stated this, it incredibly is notably meaningless. How does the thought fall on an uncomplicated cellular? i can not incredibly answer your question until you furnish me with that context. yet some issues arise, here: a million) no one in a fashionable college argues with a scientist that has been ineffective for one hundred twenty years. The state of the thought right this moment is what you could seem at. Darwin exchange right into a pioneer, yet his paintings is rather, very dated. Evolution survived through fact the winning concept for 150 years not through fact Darwin stated so, yet through fact it exchange into sensible in extra factors and shown via extra fact. 2) As in my beginning fact, through fact i don't see why evolution could rely on elementary cells (actually, extra complicated cells seem to lend themselves extra easily to evolution), i don't see how the argument makes any experience in any respect. Darwin worked out the mechanisms of his concept until now the invention of DNA. right this moment, DNA is considered the main substantial motor vehicle for genetic information. So it may actually seem to substantiate the fashionable theory that the cellular is rather complicated, and for this reason able to donning extremely some information.

2016-12-18 10:50:08 · answer #5 · answered by deibert 4 · 0 0

If science finds life outside of our universe it would not disprove the theory of evolution it would support it. Gee, try again this time think outside of Church and the bible.

2007-06-01 04:58:02 · answer #6 · answered by calmlikeatimebomb 6 · 3 0

That's inheriently ridiculous. It would PROVE EVOLUTION! The concept of natural selection is not limited to the idea that humans evolved from lower primates.

Read about evolutionary theory before you knock it.

2007-06-01 04:55:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Since we can't get outside of the universe, your hypothetical is impossible.

Perhaps you were referring to life outside of our own planet or Solar System? Said life would have developed its own evolutionary path...probably something very different from us.

2007-06-01 04:56:44 · answer #8 · answered by Scott M 7 · 0 0

Dear me - you don't have much of a clue about this stuff, do you?

And 'outside the UNIVERSE'? What can you be referring to?

If you'd really like to know the answer to your question, and are not just trying (badly) to score points, please note that there are very good answers available.

CD

2007-06-01 05:01:06 · answer #9 · answered by Super Atheist 7 · 1 0

"Life outside our universe?" Like in that parallel universe episode of Star Trek? Do you even know what you're talking about? Here's my theory: people who continue to resist evolutionary theory because they stubbornly stick to somethng written in an ancient test are not intelligent people.

2007-06-01 04:58:06 · answer #10 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers