And how did the Egyptians miss this with their extensive historical record?
2007-06-01 03:57:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by LabGrrl 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
First off, Cattle here is speaking of cows and other animals like that, horses were not included, second even if it did the Bible says that only the ones in the field would be killed, the top horses would have been in their stables. Second the fire was really hail that hit the gound so hard that it appeared as fire, and Third is that the death of the firstborns was only the firstborns! Those horses that were born second, third, etc. would have lived, so their could have been horses for the Egyptians to ride. (Note: The Egyptians also were known for hiring mercenaries, they could just hire horses from other nations anyway.)
2007-06-01 10:59:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Luke†Gospeltothepoor 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chances were good the horses were in a pasture or enclosure while the cattle were on open ranges. Soldier's horses wouldn't be kept near cattle, and since the plague struck cattle, not sheep, horses, or donkeys, (mad cow disease doesn't bother any animal but cattle) chances are good it didn't transfer.
2007-06-01 10:58:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jess 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The pharoh underextimated the power of the living God dude.
2007-06-01 10:53:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by asuoonline 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
From what I understand .. cattle's are cows..
Horses are horses ...
2007-06-01 10:53:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sapere Aude 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
cattles are cows.. why even try to be funny?
2007-06-01 10:56:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by justifiedbyfaith 1
·
0⤊
0⤋