English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

34 answers

i think having a healthy summer glow to your skin is better than looking like a milk bottle just as long as you don't look like an orange.

2007-06-01 03:15:38 · answer #1 · answered by Lo 5 · 0 3

I feel like reporting all of you who said that tanned is much better and that it looks so much healthier etc. calling me a friggin' milk bottle. How very dare you???!!!!!! There's nothing better than pale white skin, which is always flawless, while dark skin has spots and bumps and all sorts of imperfections on it. I don't mean to be getting back at tanned people but I find it disgusting that all my life I've been criticised for being, what I really am, a white person. Yes, I'm white and I'm proud of it. Don't want to make myself look coloured because there's nothing wrong with my white pale milk-like skin. Just like there's nothing wrong with tanned or yellow or black skin. Why don't you all just concentrate on keeping your skins healthy and stop slagging us whities off.
Rant over.

2007-06-01 03:33:35 · answer #2 · answered by Luvfactory 5 · 3 0

I am not sure, but all I an say is that Pale skin definately looks better tham Fake tanned skin.

2007-06-01 03:20:31 · answer #3 · answered by Caroline M 1 · 1 0

to me, The original skin is better! every skin color has a different beauty! Some people like red roses and some of them like white ones ;-) Let people love you for what you are;)
But it's fine if you get tanned under the sun, it makes you feel different and alive.

2007-06-03 03:23:31 · answer #4 · answered by white crow 2 · 1 0

It's relative - this is always going to depend upon what you personally find more attractive...it's a bit like asking who look better, blondes or brunettes!

I think that people whose skin tone compliments their hair colour and other features tend to look best, whether that be dark, tan, fair; whatever. A natural look always outweighs an extreme one in my view.

2007-06-01 03:49:25 · answer #5 · answered by Somebody 2 · 0 0

i think they both look good- many models on the runway will have pale skin, but those beach ppl can work their tans pretty good too. I would go pale.

2007-06-04 12:23:09 · answer #6 · answered by Lina 3 · 1 0

I think your natural skin colour is best.

Healthy skin is what's important and that means NOT damaged from tanning!

2007-06-01 11:21:25 · answer #7 · answered by LostWithdrawal 4 · 1 0

If you have really light skin I dont see the point in trying to get a tan. I think its beautiful

2007-06-01 03:17:08 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 2 1

I always think that tanned skin looks much better than pale skin... No offense but fairer skin tend to make one look sick or ill... when tanned skin looks much healthier, and toned too...

* It also helps me hide scar and redness in my face.

2007-06-01 03:18:19 · answer #9 · answered by Lil Me 4 · 0 2

A tan is damaged skin.

2007-06-01 03:19:43 · answer #10 · answered by Iron Serpent 4 · 1 1

It depends on the person. People generally look best with the skin God gave them, so if you stray too far from that, you're going to look unnatural, not to mention do horrible damage to your skin.

2007-06-01 03:31:00 · answer #11 · answered by naf 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers