Muslims, would you accept a check as payment for a bad check?

Question

Allahs word for four thousand years was corrupt, yet he promises to keep his word in the Qu'ran. Isn't the Qu'ran supposed to be the written word of Allah? Didn't he fail miserably at keeping his word for four thousand years? If his word could be corrupt couldnt the promise within the word also be corrupt? Hasn't Allah already proved he can't be trusted?

Yes Joe, It is the other way around. God Bless You!

Ahmed, do you really consider what you are saying? God willed that man made a liar out of him and only a fool would trust his word? Then God judges man according to what his corrupt word? Or for not believing his new written word?
If I prove to you that you can't trust my word then I demand you trust my word am I a righteous God? I'm sorry Allah does not teach that his previous word was corrupted because of this very flaw with your reasoning. Muhammad surely did not want you to think his God was not worthy of your trust...Who would follow such a God? I realize some of you were raised to believe the Qu'ran wihtout considering that it was not given to man until 600 AD...therfore God couldnt simply have began after Muhammad who would have created Muhammads parents and all those before him...So Muhammad agreed that his God was the God that already existed and he claimed the Torah and the Gospel/ he says Allah says these are his words and his word can not be changed..

the you have a dilema where Muslims either say Allah is lie...or his word became corrupt...they chose the lesser of the two evils...but it still leaves there Allah as flawed...How could a God who communcates wiht his people through his written word allow that word to be corrupted? If he had he would be forced to communicate with us verbally because he could not blame any man for never trusting his word...EVER.. now if Allah was to ever judge any man for not believing his word he would be obviouly unjust he caused his word to be corrupted then he blames us for not trusting his word? If allah's Word is not dependable, then he becomes a worthless god one only a fool could trust.
How can he say I promised you anything in his word..If he gave us a word we could not trust...a promise within the word is then untrustoworthy, Muslims often use the word logic...Is it not logical to distrust someone who lies? I know you will say Allah did not lie man changed his word..

That's no excuse it is called Allah's word and it can not be trusted and it is the only message we get from God is his written word...If allahs wrod was the Bible as he says it was and he allowed his word to become a lie and people trusted hima and his word and he continued to allow his people to be lied to...I'm sorry Ahmed your Allah is not a good god but evil and mean and wicked many people have dedicated their lives to his word and he didnt care enough about them to protect his word...Allah allowed his people to fiollow his word and his word was a lie? Then is Allah any better than a liar?
We know that Jesus taught from the word of God. He taught from the books of Moses...He quoted Isaiah 53...he did not call the word of God corrupt...He said Isaiah 53 was a prophesy that he must fufill...Have you ever read Isaiah 53? The copies we have predate the birth fo Jesus...So that are definitely accurate to what he read...Why not seek the truth for yourself read what the prophets of God

Says...God si true to his word...Jesus agreed with his word. all prophets of god are requied to agree with each other and with the word of God...Muhammd does not agree with the words of the prophets nor the written word of God, this is why you must call the true word of God corrupt...You truely should seek what the true word of God says and read the words of the prophets and seek God's truth from a God whose word is not corrupt but a God who is worthy of worship who is absolute truth and love...God Bless You Ahmed!

Answer 1

Where did you get that info? It must be the other way around. The Quran has remained unchanged throughout the years unlike the Bible which has gone through so much interpretations, versions and as well as omissions.

Answer 2

Dj, again and again, the books that were corrupted were corrupted by man, and yes this was God's will; just as He allowed the infidels to kill His prophets and persecute their followers, and just as He allowed Satan (Iblis) to rebel against Him, and He also allowed Satan to try to mislead billions of human beings.I don't understand what's the problem in that.

Jesus did not teach from a corrupted book. He was an honest messenger of God. Devils like Saul of Tarsus corrupted his teachings and claimed that he said that He was the Son of God, and that he was actually God!!???!!! Even the Jews refused such teachings.

On the contrary, Muhammad (PBUH) came with the final message. This was God's will. Had God willed that Muhammad's message to be the first message, He would've done that. But this is His will. Why do you protest? There's no logic in saying that God allowed Himself to be crucified by the Romans in the first century in order for all mankind to receive salvation!

If we were to follow your way of reasoning, then I'll ask you this question: The Native Americans and Aboriginal Australians never heard of Christ till the 1500s and 1700s. Would these people who lived before that go to Hell??!!

As for my answer to your question as to what will be the destiny of the people who lived from Paul's time to Muhammad's time, we have it that the good monotheistic Jews and the Arian and Nestorian Christians that lived during these 600 years and died without polytheising (like what the trinitarians believed), they shall go to Heaven. Trinitarians will go to Hell. That is our belief.

I hope I've answered your questioning, my friend.