Gospel Of Judas ..... what is the truth ?

Question

Here he is not the evil, corrupt, devil-inspired follower of Jesus who betrayed his master; he is instead Jesus' closest intimate and friend, the one who understood Jesus better than anyone else, who turned Jesus over to the authorities because Jesus wanted him to do so. This gospel has a completely different understanding of God, the world, Christ, salvation, human existence—not to mention of Judas himself—than came to be embodied in the Christian creeds and canon.

Answer 1

The Gnostic gospels were written by enemies of Christianity to confuse and mislead believers intentionally. They are not accepted into the canon of scripture because they are not confirmed by other writings and witnesses of the period as true.

Answer 2

Truth: the Gospel of Judas is a Gnostic gospel. What is a Gnostic Gospel? Gospels written about 200 years after Christ's death, many false doctrins attributed to Him, and they were given names of important people in the 1 century church.

These gospels had such doctrines as women becoming men to go to heaven and Jesus being married. These are not historicly accurate and cannot be verified by outside sources. However, The four gospels in the Bible are historicly acurate and can/have been verified by numerous sources other than the Bible itself. If anyone would like to debate the acuracy of the Bible I would be more than happy to do it.

Answer 3

Sometime in the 1970s, in a cave in Egypt, a copy of the “gospel of Judas” was discovered. The circumstances of the discovery have been described as shady, with those who possessed the copy asking for exorbitant amounts of money for the codex. For decades, no institution was willing to pay for the purchase due to its dubious origins. Eventually the codex of the gospel of Judas was purchased by a foundation in Switzerland. The existence of the gospel of Judas codex was made public in 2004, but the actual release of the content of the codex has been repeatedly delayed, with the now expected release date of April 2006. The dating of the gospel of Judas codex is likely the 5th century A.D. According to various accounts, up to one third of the codex is missing or illegible.



Prior to this discovery, the only reference to the gospel of Judas was in the writings of a 2nd century Christian named Irenaeus. Irenaeus essentially wrote that the gospel of Judas was the “invented history” of a long line of heretics and rebels against God. The essential message of the gospel of Judas is that Jesus wanted Judas to betray Him because it was necessary to fulfill Jesus’ plan. If it was Jesus' plan for Judas to betray Him, why would Jesus label Judas the "son of perdition" (John 17:12), and state that it would have been better if Judas had never been born (Matthew 26:24). If Judas were simply following Jesus' instructions, why would he commit suicide once he saw that Jesus was condemned (Matthew 27:5)?



The gospel of Judas is a Gnostic gospel, espousing a Gnostic viewpoint of Christianity. The gospel of Judas is simply a heretical forgery, much the same as the gospel of Thomas, the gospel of Mary, and the gospel of Philip. Just as Judas Iscariot rejected Jesus and betrayed Him with a kiss, the gospel of Judas rejects the true Gospel and truth of God with a fraudulent appearance of validity.

Recommended Resource: The Missing Gospels: Unearthing the Truth Behind Alternative Christianities by Darrell Bock.

Answer 4

To the answers above:

All gospels were written by man.

None were inspired by God any more than you were inspired by God to respond to this question. Just because you responded doesn't mean you're right.

Nearly all gospels have inconsistencies within and between them.

What about the inconsistency between Jesus knowing he was to die for the sins of man and yet Judas actually turning him over so that it could be carried out is somehow inspired by Satan?

Just kidding, don't answer that. Logic and reasoning have no place in the bickering over ancient texts.

Answer 5

Many of the apocryphal and non-canonical books of the Bible favored the Gnostic Christian version, not the Authoritarian Christian version.

Many of these books also have better archeological support and internal consistency than those that made it into the Bible.

The books in the bible were literally voted on, virtually none of them unanimously ... so much for 'divine inspirtation'.

Answer 6

Yes, this writing has good company with the many spurious false testaments that humans created to trick others into believing they were God inspired.
That is why God saw fit to ensure these (and all the other imposter writings) were not included into the canon of the Holy Scriptures.

Answer 7

This is not the same man. Judas was quite a common name at the time, which is one reason why the traitor was called Judas Iscariot.

It is interesting to me, though, that any time that something in the NT disagrees with someone's dogma, that they say it is a "new gospel", and disregard it!

Answer 8

the quick answer is that: a) the canon of the Bible got here via custom, through fact of this church homes began recognizing as official those books that have been dealt with as genuine and as stimulated; b) the church homes that grew to alter into the catholic faith (later the Roman Catholic and jap Orthodox church homes) began to enforce this canon with the intention to standardize worship and information of God between all its congregations; and c) those texts that did not make it into the canon grew to alter into much less and much less familiar through fact the church did not comprehend them as genuine. Conspiracy theorists will say extra in this, yet in very fact that the main familiar and maximum broadly customary texts of the time have been canonized and others weren't. in many situations, those different "gopels" have been of particular sects, holy to them yet handed over via others (the Gnostics are a competent occasion). different texts have been familiar yet considered as the two much less genuine or as not including sufficient to make inclusion mandatory (2nd Letter of Clement, working example). interior the tip, there exchange right into a want for a coherent set of texts and the Bible could not be infinitely super. The texts not coated interior the Bible could be substantial, yet they're going to by no capacity be taken as heavily as people who made the grade early on. it incredibly is why in my denomination we show that each and each person issues mandatory to salvation are present day in Scripture, yet that different texts (extraordinarily the Apocrypha) could be study and studied for perception.

Answer 9

It just goes to show how diverse the early Christian movement was. It wasn't put in the canon because it wasn't as popular as the books that went in the Bible. Really, it was a vote.

Answer 10

I do not know the answer to your question and I would imagine that not to many if anyone, who browses this site, could give you an actual answer. But what I can tell you is to follow the council of James and ask God.