Perhaps it should be obvious that there are many industries and even individuals who have, do, and will be come wealthy by producing problems that other people will have to resolve.
A lot of energy production works in this way. For example, it has been suggested that energy could be used to completely annihilate the radioactivity in all waste produced by nuclear power. Estimates of the energy this would require are usually in the neighborhood of the total amount of energy produced in the first place. If nuclear plants had to clean up all their waste, they could never make a penny. The same might be said with coal-burning plants and their wastes, and so on to many degrees.
And while some people would consider it only fair that those who produce waste should be the ones who clean it up, others have a different view. Their ethic is a more individualistic one. I think this quote from a (fictional) person sums it up well:
"Resources exist to be consumed. And consumed they will be, if not by this generation then by some future. By what right does this forgotten future seek to deny us our birthright? None I say! Let us take what is ours, chew and eat our fill."
This, then, is the risk for many people of a wide-scale adoption of controls and efforts to curb or counteract global warming: FREEDOM and OPPORTUNITY. There can be no doubt that many people will no longer be allowed to freely dump wastes whereever they like. Many will be forced to bear costs, and in some cases they will even be people who had nothing to do with the problems in the first place. Because this is imposing another stricture and control, it must necessarily mean that things are more strict and more controlled. For everybody.
It does not mean that all business will fail. But some certainly will. It does not mean that all costs will rise. But some certainly will. Perhaps there is reason to believe that other things will come to fill in the gaps. Perhaps. This is the kind of thing that it is more difficult to be certain of.
Which is not to say that these kinds of things shouldn't be done anyway. But a wise man knows what he surrenders when he makes a decision. This will be one of those things.
2007-06-01 12:19:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Doctor Why 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The so-called skeptics listed right here are for the main section in denial with reference to the technology used to contemporary a case for human-appropriate climate exchange. organic cycles exist, little question approximately it. yet there is little room for doubt those final 5 years that human activities, truly because of the fact the initiating of the business Age and using fossil fuels, have speeded up and shifted organic cycles. do no longer enable everyone right here inform you what is precise or incorrect, what's or isn't happening. study some books, evaluation some web content, look into the technology, and you will start to advance a greater valuable understanding of ways the organic cycles artwork and how people have inspired the cycles. It replaced into customarily whilst the politicians understood the value of inactiveness that issues truly began to take place. Now maximum governments are in quite a few stages of figuring out action plans, of engaged on mitigation, and version. that's our artwork for the foreseeable destiny. some websites under that served me properly whilst i replaced into getting up and working on the subject remember. i discover them to be respected components all. thus far as books flow, I basically finished "the large Warming" by utilising Brian Fagan. "warmth" by utilising George Monbiot is next on my examining record, yet comes tremendously cautioned. "Deep economic device" or "warm, Flat and Crowded" can help upload a different attitude to the blend, too.
2016-10-09 05:43:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honestly, I am not concerned because I have read articles from top climatologists, such as Richard Lindzen, who is the head of Climatology at MIT, the most respected scientific university in the nation, and Timothy Ball, who is the top Canadian scientist, who believe that this is occurring within natural range and that humans are not contributing to whatever is occurring and that Al Gore is absolutely wrong.
2007-06-01 10:27:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike R 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
My primary concern would be that if the majority of the human race doesnt wake up and smell the java then were all gonna wind up screwed. On the other hand, if by some miracle, we do come to our collective senses and manage to save mother earth then that would be a good thing. A very good thing indeed.
2007-05-31 20:51:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
WHY
Its hard to think straight where i am .its 46 degrees celcius in the shade .
I have answered close to 1000 questions by now,related to Environmental conditions
People keep asking the same things .
Why cant they check other questions gone before ,there are thousands ,and many thousands of answers ,why do they need to ask it again and again.?
Why cant they accept what is happening to this planet ?
Why cant they accept that we humans have caused devastating destruction all over the planet .
And not just for the last 50 years ,the Sahara used to be forrests (,but you cant deforrest on the equator because you cant replant under that hot a sun.It is now growing 7 miles per year burning the edges .
The building of Spanish Armada made Spain a dessert country as the Phoenicians deforested Lebanon for their trading fleet.
Ghengas Kahn burned everything(cities ,agriculture,forrests ) and filled all the wells with sand ,turning vast teritories into desserts.
Today large parts of the world are turned into deserts because of irresponsible farming,overpumping carbon Aquifers ,over grazing ,deforestation,all causing desertification.
I have been in the jungles of Oaxaca and discussed with the Natives the mountain before us ,Mostly deforrested ,scarred by landslides and dotted with madly steep corn patches (which only produced for 3 years ),and devoid of clouds.
They all agreed that the days were hotter ,there was less rain ,And the river was dry part of the year.
When they were boys ,the river was bigger and ran all year around,the mountain was always covered in clouds with daily rains .And the days were more bearable .
Their actions in the desperate plight to feed their enormous families of avarage 12 kids per family ,often much more ,had destroyed their home ground with indisputable climate changes.
In Africa I have seen lush wooded lands change into dessert within a few years by large invading comunities ,who devoured the trees for building and firewood ending up in a dessert with out water
and with a hot sun under which no new plantation was possible.
Granted the climatic changes are local ,but effects neighboring areas ,there is less rainfall, rivers dry up ,
BUT these things are happening ALL over the world and nobody can convince me that COLLECTIVELY this does NOT effect the Global climate
Global precipitation,Global temperatures,Global water supplies ,Global everything.
Millions of hectares are lost because of the roads systems ,expanding population and the resulting settlements.
Mexico looses half a million hectares per year in the quest for Ethanol and this is happening in Africa ,Borneo,Malasia,etc and will become much much more ,when America passes a new bill about the production of Ethanol ,
Replacing indigenous forrests wiping out all the wild life and bio diversity and replacing it with monoculture plantations grown with fertilizers that will only have plagues of insects as inhabitants,which will be combatted with Pesticides .The natural soil balance will be destroyed and contiued growth will only be possible with chemicals .
Is there no limit to the waste of money and natural resources in this insane attempt to suposedly save te Environment .
Humans ARE contaminating ,the Air,the Soil and Waters.This evidence is for all to see all over the world ,
And cannot be whitewashed with claims that humanity is inocent .
Overpopulation puts pressures on all Natural resources and increases all the bad side effects of Humanity such as deminishing the overall bio mass and wide spread polution
Why dont they want to look after Nature ,it is where all the conditions that makes life pleasant and possible for us comes from ?Air ,Food ,Water to grow food and to make beer with ,and most of all a bearable climate ,not to mention the absorbsion of harmfull gasses.
Why dont they want to keep the neighborhood clean so their kids dont have to play in the trash ,?
Why do they want to kill animals ?
Why is it important whose fault Global Warming is?
If it was Gaia who is fed up with the virus infesting her ,
If the Sun is having a stroke .?
If God (Jehova) is having a tantrum?
If humanity caused it ?
If it is Natural regular phenomina?
Who cares ?
What is important is that we are in the poop,and if we can do something that will make the poop less ,we should try to do it .
Why dont these negative blissfull people go to their damn Paradise ?
So that we can get on with trying to make the best of ours ? or whats left of it.
Oops
the heat is making me hot.
2007-05-31 17:43:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋