I now understand why we are the laughing stock of the educated world. I just read some of the responses, so I must counter their statements with facts.
1. The T-Rex was a carnivore or an omnivore. Several findings of T-Rex fossils included small bones form other dinosaurs located in what would have been the T-Rex's digestive tract. While the teeth were ideal for separating flesh from bone, some smaller bones passed through to the stomach.
2. Humans do have teeth designed for eating meat; they're called "canines". Look it up you uneducated @#$%'s.
3. Pandas are known to eat fish and other sources of meat. Any zoologist knows this.
4. The Bible gives a vague reference to some kind of "Behemoth", not a T-Rex. By the way, the T-Rex was not even the largest of the meat-eaters in its own time.
5. "Creation Science" is, in fact, not science at all. The scientific method requires that there exist a testable hypothesis. No such hypothesis exists in Creationism. Calling this a science is like calling a spoon a duck in disguise. Neither has anything to do with the other. Please, pull your heads out of the sand, get back to school, and try to learn something. This is just embarrassing for the United States.
2007-05-31 16:03:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by seattlefan74 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Yes, T-Rex would certainly have starved if it had to exist on vegetation. The species was obviously intelligently designed to be a killing machine, just as crocodiles and great white sharks were. However, I'm curious. Why do they say T-Rex was vegetarian if they also say that T-Rex existed alongside humans? I thought they claimed that all animals were vegetarians before the fall of Adam and Eve, but became carnivores after the fall?? Well it hardly matters. Both versions are equally absurd.
2007-05-31 16:00:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
As one person stated, panda bears have carnivore teeth, but they are primarily herbivores. Humans eat meat, but we don't have 1-inch fangs.
And, why don't you go ask the Creation Science Museum why T-Rex had meat-eating teeth if it was a herbivore? After all, *they* made the claim, and you should ask them to explain it.
That answergenesis site is definitely worth checking out.
2007-05-31 15:53:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by ATWolf 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think if you do just a little research you will find out that T-Rex was a indeed herbivore.
I knew this long before the museum opened. Just because the museum says it, that does not mean it is not true. I think you would learn a lot if you gave the museum a half a chance.
2007-05-31 15:44:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by johnnywalker 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Maybe T Rex was a living mulcher. Adam would toss trees into the T Rex's mouth and he would spit out nice bark mulch.
Bloody amazing, as my Brit husband would say.
2007-05-31 15:53:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by in a handbasket 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
All creatures were herbivores until the fall of man. Maybe God planned ahead.
2007-05-31 15:46:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fish <>< 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Many animals living today that never eat meat -have canines (sharp, shredding teeth). I'm amazed a top contributor like you wouldn't know that!
Do a bit of research, friend.
2007-05-31 15:41:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by baronbago 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Humans eat meat with their small teeth.
2007-05-31 15:49:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
To devour Dino sized coconuts i guess.lol
I'm an intelligent design believer but whoever came up with this noise is a little f*cked in the head.
2007-05-31 15:40:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Christian...Science??.....Museum?! Oww
2007-05-31 15:41:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by whois1957 3
·
3⤊
1⤋