2007-05-31 14:35:54 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
haha...lol
2007-05-31 14:38:24 · answer #1 · answered by Wikisidr 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am a non religious believer. With that said, the word atheist is believing into something. I only believe in days that I don't have to work, because some one invented a holliday. I thank them for that. But, back to the 20/20 issue. Do you think that it was a fair debate? Heck no, the show it self has a religious agenda. Ofcourse they will always win. Who wants to have a bunch of atheists "threatening" the peace. Lots of journalists are paid to lie, deceive, and always convince the viewers to agree with them. If you are a believer in god stay that way. Eventually you will realize nobody will save you. lol.
2007-05-31 15:09:07 · answer #2 · answered by SAC 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ray Comfort promised he would SCIENTIFICALLY prove the existence of God without using the Bible or faith. Within 5 minutes he was quoting the Bible, and the rest of the argument was "we believe". He didn't destroy anything but his own credibility.
Granted, I thought the atheists in the debate could have done a lot better with their arguments. I was pretty frustrated at the things I felt they should have said but didn't, but they still presented a way more convincing argument than Ray Comfort did.
The whole debate wasn't that good.
2007-05-31 14:45:12 · answer #3 · answered by Jess H 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I can only hope that Ray and Kirk do some more of these. They do so much to undermine the creationist movement with their embarassing arguments that a few more of these, and we 'evolutionists' will only have to say the word "banana" to get a great laugh.
2007-05-31 14:46:33 · answer #4 · answered by secretsauce 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I didn't see anyone on that debate on 20/20 that had anything pertinent to say, not either side. It was a pathetic excuse for a debate.
2007-05-31 14:44:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
This has got to be a joke. Ray and Kirk said that they would prove, scientifically, without reference to faith, that their god exists. They didn't. How exactly did that "destroy" the atheists?
2007-05-31 14:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by YY4Me 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Some people have even better vision than 20/20.
2007-05-31 14:38:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why aren't you smart enough to actually debate instead of asking pointless questions like these? And I didn't watch that.
2007-05-31 14:38:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Ray Comfort couldn't totally destroy an intelligently designed banana.
2007-05-31 14:40:03 · answer #9 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 7⤊ 2⤋
because he didn't. He was a fool. Just like in the debate where he was totally destroyed.
2007-05-31 14:41:30 · answer #10 · answered by punch 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
If you're talking about those two guys, including the one from "Growing Pains," then you are sadly mistaken. I only saw parts of it and I, as a believer, thought they were totally off base!
2007-05-31 14:40:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋