English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

it already has if case you haven't noticed

2007-05-31 13:14:38 · answer #1 · answered by illinipower 2 · 1 1

Unions are destroying themselves with greed.How many U S companies have sent their companies overseas because of the unions?Minimum wage was just increased for the first time in over 10 years.Now if you want to discuss the impact the reform bill will have on these things the reform can't do anything but help.Companies will HAVE TO pay the "illegals"who no longer are illegal a going wage.So no more undercutting American workers for illegals for lower pay.

2007-05-31 13:19:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know how many of you know, Mexico is the 4th riches country in the World.

The bill has nothing to do with racizm, it has all to do with "SLAVERY OF THE CITIZENS OF ALL THREE COUNTRIES."

When did the Citizens of America, Canada and Mexico get to vote on such important bills which will have a dramatic impact on our families and future generations lives.

The Representatives who vote yes for the Kennedy Immigration Bill to me will have committed Treason against the Constitution of the United States And the Legal American Citizens.

All the citizens of Mexico, America and Canada better wake up fast and stop listening the the political correct propaganda and contact your Representative's to vote "No" or all of us will soon become slaves to the Elite of the World!! (Like George Soro's, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, George Bush, Oil Companies, Members of the Council of Foreign Wars, Nato, United Nations, Robert Pastor! For A Complete List of members from Mexico, United States, Canada, do research on Robert Pastor, Nafta treaties, and the above list people, companies, and organizations like The North American Union and The New World Order! I hope this will motivate you into action to stop this Bill and take over of our countries. This information sure has me working hard to stop it!!

We the citizens must demand a "NO", and we must take back our countries.

2007-05-31 14:54:32 · answer #3 · answered by jcprov47 1 · 0 0

Illegal immigration has already contributed to lower wages and a decrease in union membership. Studies show that as illegal immigration increases, union membership decreases. Which is why so many unions are eager to fold in the illegals. Why hire a union worker when you can hire an illegal and exploit the crap out of them?

2007-05-31 13:52:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Unions want the immigrants for new members. They will give a TEMPORARY fix or false hope for a war that was already fought. Count the businesses yourself. Most that were Union just pulled up shop and left!!! For CHEAPER wages.. Left the country. So honestly.....I can't wait when they "take it to the streets and DEMAND" they will be demanding their very jobs go elsewhere. They act like this is a NEW thing......if it wasn't so serious it would be funny. They act like they were the very FIRST ones to experience this......LOL......been there done that .....LOL LOL...LOL...and race ain't got crap to do with it. They don't have a clue and won't listen to anyone. We just get to sit and watch another boring re-run......just to PROVE the obvious.

2007-05-31 13:32:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not immediately, no. Keep in mind that the illegal immigration that has gone on since the last Amnesty has already contributed to slower wage growth (and lower real wages), and that the power of Unions has been steadily declining for decades.

The current Amnesty would probably do the same thing - lead to even greater illegal immigration in the coming decades, which would further the same trends.

2007-05-31 13:13:31 · answer #6 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 2

Yes it would, and thanks for capitalizing "Unions!" Workers need them more than ever before, just like we need companies who hire illegal aliens less than ever. Before a company can do business in the U.S., and I mean sell its products here, it should be required to meet three requirements:

1. It must pay all required taxes, fees and fines levied against it. No more claiming offshore tax havens, either.

2. It must verify that all of its employees have the legal right to work in the U.S.

3. It must pay no less than the legal minimum wage to all its employees.

Doing business in our country is a privilege, not a right.

2007-05-31 13:30:26 · answer #7 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 0 0

i ought to admit you're a solid cherry picker. regrettably, you are able to prepare something you want via cherry choosing. There are winners and losers with the two unfastened commerce in products and persons; inspite of the shown fact that, in accordance to unfastened commerce economics, over the long-term, wages circulate down with migration regulations by using fact international productiveness is going down. The wages might have long gone up for all varieties of motives. In Canada, human beings died final twelve months by using fact of Listeria tainted meat from Maple Leaf meals, so in step with probability quick desires to diminish its turnover to sidestep multi-million dollar proceedings. in step with probability bigger mechanization and computerization necessitates lowering the turnover besides. Economies are lots too complicated for this way of cherry choosing prognosis, so which you should stay with the basics of economics rather. via deporting foreigners, the U.S. economic equipment ought to contract. Immigrants create jobs and wealth too and displace human beings up the salary scale. in the experience that your concept made lots experience, then you definately could want migration regulations for your self interior the U.S., yet you do no longer. Immigration isn't limited to guard the U.S. economic equipment or enhance your salary. this is limited by using fact of xenophobia, until you think of you belong to the grasp race, which may be absurd. human beings have a bias against foreigners. that's why foreigners get accused of no longer paying their share of taxes while they do laboring artwork, yet you do no longer seem waiting to sentence human beings for doing an identical artwork. Do you relatively think of your Congressman sits at his table with some mathematical formula calculating the right type of immigrants mandatory to maximise your salary at a quick plant. that's no longer the way it relatively works; he's not that clever. He votes for fewer immigrants in accordance with anti-immigrant lobbying from human beings such as you.

2016-11-24 20:07:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the guest worker provision might. That is why Byron Dorgan, a Democrat who is very pro-labor, tried to remove it from the bill (what the politicans overruled calling it a "poison pill").

2007-05-31 13:18:55 · answer #9 · answered by kallista 3 · 0 1

Destroy, possiby not, but 'erode', certainly.

2007-05-31 13:17:43 · answer #10 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers