If GW Bush was elected because of religion, doesn't faith DESERVE to be attacked?

Answer 1

too late.

religion is already attacking religon (again)

thanks to Dumbya

Answer 2

I do not think his election was influenced any more than expected, however we are at war because he said 'god told him to'. I would say that puts the USA in a very, untenable predicament.

Most of Europe, Russia and China do not have strong if any religious beliefs. We are a bit of a laughing stock in those countries. A turnaround is desperately needed.

Answer 3

Bush was never elected because of religion. Stupid idea.

Answer 4

To be fair, just as we cannot judge all Muslims by the subgroup of terrorists who call themselves Muslim, we cannot judge all of Christendom by G-Dub. However, you are right in wondering about all those Christians who voted for him due to religion, as I do not see him as a good example. I also wonder about all the people who voted for him for other reasons.

Answer 5

He was not elected because of Religion, he is not and never was a leader of any Religious group.

Next?

Peace!

Answer 6

guy, won't be in a position to you people step faraway from the partisanship for a 2d. real...in case you have self belief in abortion, gay marriage, gun bans, extreme taxes to pay for entitlement courses, and you do not have self belief in God..then that's no longer elementary to back something a Rep administration does. on the turn part...while you're against abortion, gay rights, gun bans, and you do have self belief in God...then that's no longer elementary to consider something a Dem administration does. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, what one and all of you desires to realize is that there are places interior the international that would desire to grant a rats a** approximately democrat v. republican and/or liberal v. conservative. In some places, there is fullyyt one massive distinction that concerns...muslim or non-muslim. In those places muslims are allowed to stay and non-muslims are decapitated. Our enemies are a made of this environment. definite, republicans have been in workplace while 911 handed off. definite, there have been greater assaults in the time of the Clinton years. definite, Clinton's inactiveness confident OBL that the US replaced into susceptible and ripe for attack (via OBL's very own admission). definite, Al-Qaida declared conflict on the US in 1992. definite, Reagan could've paid greater interest to threats outdoors of the U.S.. definite, Carter replaced into thoroughly impotent against Iranian terrorist. definite, Bush, Sr. screwed the pooch royally via leaving Saddam in potential after booting him out of Kuwait. definite, Bush, Sr. screwed up even worse via inciting the Iraqi people to overthrow their dictator and sat back and watched them get slaughtered attempting to take his suggestion. Why won't be in a position to y'all see that that's relatively not gay marriage, that's relatively not abortion, that's relatively not entitlement courses. only placed...that's relatively not purely some water cooler subject count used via the two part to devalue the different. each and every administration from Carter up has a hand in this. all of them DROPPED THE BALL!! until we are in a position to grant up the partisan bickering and consider out this threat with user-friendly experience and readability, the two one in each and every of that are misplaced interior the bickering, have been doomed. era...

Answer 7

Who said he was elected because of religion? I mean really come on now, did you just pull that out of your *** or what?

Answer 8

Atheists like me voted for him in 2000,

so,

his fiscal policies did attract a block,

should we attack atheism?

Answer 9

Nah the hippies just need to learn to vote

Answer 10

YES! The war is a holy war or religious war anyway