Must secularists declare ware on these theocratic or would-be theocratic monsters, it seems they have been waging a war against us and freedom of expression for some time already.
2007-05-31 01:35:02 · 11 answers · asked by CHEESUS GROYST 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If you believe in unfettered science, sexual emancipation and an open society you may need to start fighting back to keep them.
2007-05-31 01:36:49 · update #1
dilligere_P: Don't you bet on it, the pen can often be mightier than the sword when it comes to waging wars and winning them.
2007-05-31 01:42:48 · update #2
Damn straight.
2007-05-31 01:39:05 · answer #1 · answered by ZombieTrix 2012 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Can't be done.
Orwellian logic must apply.
The GREEN nation must aling with the RED NATION to defeat the BLUE NATION
It's a law of the universe.
That means the SECULAR must ALIGN with CHINA, parts of the former USSR and wage war against everyone else.
The Secular barely have a billion. Christiainity 2.2 billioin, that's 2 to 2.4 odds. Islam 0.8 to 1 odds. Those odds favor the religious not the secular.
You need China's 1+ Billion and their military.
That means the Secular gets in bed with the Communists and since the Communsits prevail they will, as did the USSR after World War 2, divided the conquered lands very unevenly.
I'd say China would rule the entire "Asian" regions, all the Middle East and Africa.
That would leave the Secular feeling, well, a bit uneasy at the fact that China how controls 3.5 billioni and the secular barely 2 billion.
Forget about going after the New World, most of the Americas are Christian and will unify and fight back.
That's what NAFTA was about.
The AMERICAN union, which probably also included a secret defense pact.
2007-05-31 08:46:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I do fight against that sort of thing. The thing is though, even if they do get what they want, a theocracy... it will fall apart. It always does! Look at Egypt, a theocracy in its own right during it's height of rulership... what is it now? A tourist trap. Pyramids in the sand with no religious or political authority attached to them, like they once had. Rome... well we all know what happened to it... though it was a Republic (gasp, so are we) with a Senate (holy cow), it was still ruled over by religious emporers who passed laws according to his religion... thru the Senate, which normally followed the emporers lead on trivial affairs of religious dominion in Rome (seeing as All of the Emporers were considered "Sons of God")... There hasn't been a theocracy to stand firm and hold it together.
In these modern times, it would fall apart even quicker what with all of the different religions, denominations within those religions and even the smaller sects... Taking away our freedoms will eventually lead our religious leaders to take away the freedoms of those who agree with that religion. It ALWAYS works this way. And it's truly amazing that all of these supposed history "experts" within the different religions seem to miss that point completely.
2007-05-31 09:02:40 · answer #3 · answered by River 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As a Christian, history proves that secularists have been declaring war on God's people since the Flood of Noah.
Although I am Christian, my Salvation comes by way of the Jewish people and a free gift from Christ Jesus. My Savior is a Jew.
The Bible says Jesus Christ is King of Kings and Lord of Lords and He will rule and reign with complete Divine Authority - Theocracy. Just maybe that you need to get accustomed to it.
Read the back of God's book the Holy Bible, the infallible Word of the Living God. God wins this war that you are waging.
Only 2 religions my friend - God and man. You've chosen man. The Lord wants you to choose Him. He created you and He loves you.
2007-05-31 08:49:13 · answer #4 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Theocracy = totalitarianism?
Give me a break. I think you need to expand your philosphical basis a little bit more.
In logic, you must have foundational basis for a premise before you can arrive at a substantive conclusion.
With this illogical statement, you are taking a suppositional premise, and arriving at a fractional conclusion. As a result, your end conclusion is bull-s**t!
Nice try, though!
2007-05-31 08:45:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No just beat them at their own game. Make Benny Hinn use his private jet to fly food relief to Bangla Desh. Make them open their books to the light of day. How much of Mother Theresa's contributions are sitting in coffers in Rome. Lets find out.
2007-05-31 08:39:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Lock and load, it's time to purge the world of these fascists.
2007-05-31 08:40:29 · answer #7 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
lol.
Yah, buddy--rally the troops. But chances are, you aren't much of the fighting type.
muahs
el edito: Hey, I wasn't talking about physical combat--c'mon, we all know THAT. I was speaking generally.
2007-05-31 08:40:10 · answer #8 · answered by Soundtrack to a Nightmare 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
From what I have seen secularists are to pussified to fight anybody.
2007-05-31 08:41:03 · answer #9 · answered by Deer Slayer 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I started a long time ago.
2007-05-31 08:37:45 · answer #10 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋