Yes.Don't believe the lie!Also, the Earth really is flat and all those space images are hoaxes.
2007-05-30 23:25:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Demopublican 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. The Bible mentions dinosaurs, so what you're imposing is incorrect. I will allow you to do your own homework, but it is there about the dinosaurs and every living creature. Here is a bit of help for you. You have to do the rest:
According to the Genesis account, animals were created during the fifth and sixth creative periods or ‘days.’ If the Hebrew expression translated “great sea monsters” [Hebrew, tan·ni·nim´] includes dinosaurs, which often inhabited swampy, watery areas, this would mean that dinosaurs were created on the fifth “day.” (Genesis 1:21) We do not know whether they continued to exist until man was created (toward the close of the sixth “day”). At the very latest it seems likely that they must have disappeared off the earth at the time of the flood of Noah’s day. Dinosaurs were reptiles, and some kinds of dinosaurs bear strong resemblance structurally and otherwise to lizards (sauros is, in fact, the Greek word for “lizard”; saura in Leviticus 11:29, LXX).
Not all types of dinosaurs were of such gigantic size. Hence, even if they had survived till the Flood, this would not have required taking pairs of the mammoth varieties into the ark. Other smaller members of the particular family or “kind” to which these belonged would have sufficed to fulfill the divine command.—Genesis 6:19, 20; 7:14.
2007-05-31 06:29:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Haveing actually found a fossilised dinosaur myself, and yes it was in the ground, I don't agree with your theory that the whole dinosaur thing is a hoax. The one you saw had been treated so it could be put on display. The bones were cast and moulded, then wired together for the public
2007-05-31 06:26:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by chalqua 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hate to break it to ya, but why the hell would every museum and everything go through all the trouble to make dinosaurs? Its not even slightly possible, and even less possible that it was to "assault the christians". The molded plastic you saw was a mold of the real bones, that are stored in a safer environment, but I'm sure you can see the real ones too.
2007-05-31 06:25:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Theo 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No these bones are real there is no conspiracy.
You may remember that recently in the news, there was a report of a Tyrannosaurus rex bone found with soft tissue (still-elastic blood vessel). The story mentions that the paleontologists are very surprised that this soft tissue was found at all. They claim that paleontologists of the past never bothered to look for any residue of soft tissue before, because they assumed that it would have degraded long ago (Can you believe it? Scientists actually admit making assumptions) . To explain their confusion they indicate that they have more to learn about fossilization and the preservation of tissue. However this is not their problem. The problem has nothing to do with their understanding of fossilization, but their error in dating these bones.
2007-05-31 06:29:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brian 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, science didn't just make up dinosaurs. They did make up faulty dating methods however.
http://www.allaboutcreation.org/dragon-history.htm
Dragon History - Universal Concept in Ancient Cultures
Dragon history is nearly universal throughout the world's ancient cultures. Where did this global concept originate? How did societies throughout the world describe, record, draw, etch, sew and carve such creatures in such uniformity, if they did not witness these creatures during their lifetimes?
Dragon History - Dinosaurs Revealed
Dragon history can be summed up as follows: "The dragons of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past. They are much like the great reptiles [dinosaurs], which inhabited the earth long before man is supposed to have appeared on earth." (Knox Wilson, "Dragon", The World Book Encyclopedia, Vol. 5, 1973, pg. 265.)
In light of that statement from The World Book Encyclopedia, many people don't realize that paleontology (the study of past geological ages based primarily on the study of fossils) is a relatively new science. In fact, the concept of dinosaurs (giant lizards) only surfaced in its present form less than 180 years ago. Prior to that, anyone who found a large fossilized bone assumed it came from an elephant, dragon or giant. There wasn't any notion of "science" attached to these finds.
It wasn't until 1841 that English scientist Richard Owens suggested that the group of "newly discovered" animals be called "dinosaurs," which literally means "terrible lizards." Throughout the next few decades, the first artist depictions of dinosaurs were actually comical when compared to what we can scientifically discern today. How then, do pottery, linens, cave paintings, and written descriptions of "dragons" from 2,000 to 4,000 years ago depict dinosaurs better than what science could muster in the mid-1800's?
Dragon History - A Summation of the Evidence
Where are all these accounts of dragon history? Actually, let's start with the Bible, the most widely published book in history. A search for the word "dragon" in the King James Version of the Bible produces 34 separate matches across 10 different books written between approximately 2000 BC and 90 AD. The word "dragon" (Hebrew: tannin) is used throughout the Old Testament, and most directly translates as "sea or land monsters." In the Book of Job, the author describes the great creatures, Behemoth (Job 40) and Leviathan (Job 41). Although the latest Bible translations use the words elephant, hippo or crocodile instead of Behemoth and Leviathan, the original Hebrew and the context of the descriptions do not allow for these interpretations.
Of course, dragon history is by no means limited to the Bible. Dragon accounts from China, Europe, the Middle East, and ancient Latin America share similar accounts of "dragons" and other beasts. Some cultures revered these creatures. For instance, records of Marco Polo in China show that the royal house kept dragons for ceremonies and dragons were hunted for meat and medicine in the Province of Karazan. Records of the Greek historian Herodotus and the Jewish historian Josephus describe flying reptiles in ancient Egypt and Arabia. In other cultures, it was a great honor to kill these creatures. There are numerous records of warriors killing great beasts in order to establish credibility in a village. Gilgamesh, Fafnir, Beowulf and other famous legends, including the mythology of Egypt, Greece and Rome, include specific descriptions of dragons and other dinosaur-like creatures.
Dragon history is revealed on numerous objects of ancient art throughout the world. Dinosaur-like creatures are featured on Babylonian landmarks, Roman mosaics, Asian pottery and royal robes, Egyptian burial shrouds and government seals, Peruvian burial stones and tapestries, Mayan sculptures, Aboriginal and Native American petroglyphs (carved rock drawings), and many other pieces of ceremonial art throughout ancient cultures. What does all this evidence really mean? Please keep reading…
Read Dragon History Page 2 Now! http://www.allaboutcreation.org/dragon-history-2.htm
2007-05-31 07:16:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Martin S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you really insist on being religious in spite of scientific evidence, then just use your faith and insist the world is still only 6,000 years old and if god wanted to make it with Dinosaur bones and Amber and other evidence intact, that's his business. He's God.
2007-05-31 06:26:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
it's all the devils multi-billion dollar plan to slowly recreate the historical evidence of our planet and talk everyone into buying time share condos and stock in the home shopping network so, watch out, okay! good thing your already thinking for yourself though ;)
2007-05-31 06:26:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
God made the dinosaurs. He got rid of them, before He made man.
2007-05-31 06:41:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Rock & Roll Doctor 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
You have got to be kidding me....you probaly still believe in Santa Claus. Of course there is no conspiracy and to save yourself humiliation never ask this question in public!!
2007-05-31 06:39:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by stmill33 2
·
1⤊
0⤋