You do realize that you're asking creationists to read an article that is:
1) Complex and scientific
2) Not the Bible
... don't you?
2007-05-30 17:08:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Theres no transitional fossils because evolution is a continual process, we(we is the keyword) are the ones who said this is a reptile and here it starts being a bird, and we won't tell you where's the beer cause you would drink it all.
2007-05-30 17:03:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Unless we have an example of everything that ever lived there will always be a gap in the record.
And mines a pint!
2007-05-30 17:01:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I suppose that this is to show that humans and apes came from a common ancestor. Of course we did. But just who was that common ancestor? I am too tired to go farther except to say Cro-Magnon
2007-05-30 19:25:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bullfrog21 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because people say they were planted by Satan to throw us off...personally I believe there is a God and He was responsible for evolution and people can hate me for that but I don't hate them for believing different from me so it doesn't matter.
2007-05-30 17:02:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by mosquitoe_13 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Technically, all fossils are transitional.
2007-05-30 17:05:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
*lol* I was about to say "I saw some transitional fossils in National Geographic."
2007-05-30 17:01:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
the hardcore creationists will say that is clearly a monkey skull
2007-05-30 17:05:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Don't Fear the Reaper 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
fossils are very rare, we are lucky enough to have what we have right now.
2007-05-30 17:03:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by 8theist 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
ha ha
2007-05-30 17:03:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋