So let me get this straight. As long as sexual perversion (according to the current moral code?

Question

which is slowly disintergrating) is done by consenting adults, anything goes? Is that correct? But if the same acts involve children or adolescents, then its not okay. Is this what I am hearing from all you liberals tonight who hate what is written in the Word?

Society as a community decides the moral code.
Guess a new one is being written these days

Answer 1

Well currently yes, but what the pro gays are not willing to face is this simple truth: If being gay is how a person is born not a choice, then the following logic will soon be-If someone prefers to have sex with children-it is because they were born that way-not because of choice.
The pro-gays apparently can not follow their logic through to the next step.
After they convince people gay is natural, the the pedophiles get their turn. Following them? The rapists and murderers.
Gay people have no clue as to the boundaries they try to tear down for their acceptance to modern culture, will naturally break down the barriers for every other form of conduct, even conduct they find disgusting, but will have to admit by their standards must be ruled ACCEPTABLE.

Answer 2

As long as whatever they're doing is between two consensual adults, and doesn't hurt anyone, then I don't give a rats butt what people do behind closed doors. Why do you care?
And OBVIOUSLY it's not OK if it involves children or adolescents. They're not old enough to give consent.
If YOU care so much about what's written in "the Word", then do you eat shellfish? Eat pork? Wear blended fabrics? Do you have a loan that you pay interest on? (Mortgage, car loan, etc.?) According to the Bible, those are ALL abominations. It gives strict instructions in the Bible not to do those things.
If you do any of those things, then you are a hypocrite to condemn anything anyone else does, sexually or otherwise, that goes against "the Word."

Answer 3

Has she became right into a fetishist or basically discovered an exceptionally smart thank you to regulate you? look, after 19 years, a individual is fortunate to be getting any in any respect, yet now you comprehend a thank you to get it every time you desire & any way you desire... Make lemonade bro, and if its too bitter to swallow, throw some vodka in there, lord knows that facilitates while my better half has a peculiar and wonderful request, like missionary place or something.

Answer 4

Um... Yes. It's like those sexual perversions your husband does to you. Fine between two consenting adults, but if he were to do that to a the five year old down the street, it probably would be a problem.

And what is written in the Word is not to judge others. Remember? He who is without sin, you can cast the first stone.

Now, if you're going to a hate filled church, where they teach you to be just as hate filled towards homosexuals as you would have been if you'd never even heard of Jesus, then you better look at the fruits of that church, and decide what you're doing there.

Wow, that felt good to type out. Maybe I should have used all caps!

Answer 5

Liberalism in today’s postmodern world does not subscribe to objective standards. To them everything is relative. What’s true for me is true and what’s true for you is true. If those truths happen to be opposites it is not a problem because the Law of Noncontradiction (A cannot = -A) does not exist for them; Thus holding that every proposition is both true and false.


Morality then becomes meaningless because by definition Morality is:

Morality = standards of conduct that are accepted as right or proper

Morality (from Latin moralitas "manner, character, proper behaviour") refers to the concept of human action which pertains to matters of right and wrong — also referred to as "good and evil" — used within three contexts:
•individual conscience;
•systems of principles and judgments — sometimes called moral values (see value theories below) —shared within a cultural, religious, secular or philosophical community; and
•Codes of behavior or conduct morality.

Value theories investigate how people positively and negatively value things and concepts, the reasons they use in making their evaluations and the scope of applications of legitimate evaluations across the social world. When put into practice, these views are meant to explain our views of the good and by extension evil.

Note to icarus62: Morality as can be readily seen is not based in harm. The fact that harm could be a result of immoral behavior is wholly secondary to good vs. evil.

Answer 6

YES! If two consenting adults want to get as freaky as they want to be then it is ok. Why do you mythological wish granting bearded man worshipers feel the need to worry about what others are doing in the privacy of their own homes? Jealous?

Answer 7

"the current moral code"

the moral code you refer to is neither current nor universal.

edit: so you're saying legislating morality is conservative?
so much for minimal government intrusion into private life.

Answer 8

Who gets to decide what is and isn't perverse??? You? Me? A 2000 year old outdated archaic book???? The government? Or the individual???

As long as it feels good, and both people are of consenting age, and consenting to the acts...go for it.

No one is being harmed or victimized here.

Liberal doesn't mean bad, or misinformed.

Answer 9

If more people were capable of properly determining the harm they are doing, there might be a closer look at the 'no harm, no foul' stance they take. A more appropriate response for many today might be 'it can't be wrong as long as everyone gets paid'.
It's easy to see that humanism and situational ethics still lives.

Answer 10

Last I heard, people who look in other people while they're engaged in sex are called "peeping toms".

Perhaps we should add "peeping daisymaes" too.

I talked of "competent, consenting adults" because I believe it requires all three qualities to be able to handle the responsibility that goes with sex.

Children are not "competent" to handle that responsibility, and should not be a part of a sexual relationship.

As for your "Word", I find it impossible to take anyone seriously who worships a god who, according to your "Word" drowned all the babies and butterflies in the world.

I do not believe your religion gives you any authority to lecture -anyone- about morality.