English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy littles ones against the stones" PSALM 137:9
Now, I might be reading this wrong, but I'm pretty sure it's telling us to stone our kids.

2007-05-30 13:22:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

12 answers

I'm partial to this one:

"From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some youths came out of the town and jeered at him. "Go on up, you baldhead!" they said. "Go on up, you baldhead!" He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the LORD. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the youths." - 2 Kings 2:22-24

There's also this gem:
"But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's foreskin and touched {Moses'} feet with it. "Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me," she said. So the LORD let him alone."
- Exodus 4:25-26

And this classic from Hay-Soos:
"If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away." - Matthew 5:29-31

2007-05-30 13:25:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

thats a Roman influenced book for you.

the world should re-educate the fish god worshipping Roman cultists with the piss breath. Meaning ancient roman used human urine as mouthwash. Basically modern times means real people can trust that when a Roman speaks it's the piss talking. So they are really giving us something the body does need. Thats the reason their empire should never be ressurectted. All hail free countries of the world, and the roman legion are rendered uselss in the modern day nuclear powers, thus freedon can begin to exist for real.

2007-05-30 20:29:02 · answer #2 · answered by I AM=iam 1 · 1 0

That passage deals with the Israelites moving into a foreign land, namely the environs of Babylon. This revenge for the Edomites attacking the Israelites.

The passage could be taken literally in a manner of speech as war back then in those ages, the vanquish is totally annihlated to the last person. *shrug*

2007-05-30 20:32:49 · answer #3 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 1 1

I don't know, but every time Dubya says "we're spreading freedom" I picture bombs falling out of a B-2.

2007-05-30 20:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Good Grief...and Christians don't understand why I don't believe in the Bible.
The enemy's kids or not, that is sick.

2007-05-30 20:26:50 · answer #5 · answered by Sptfyr 7 · 4 0

2 Kings 6: 28 "This woman said to me, 'Give up your son so we may eat him today, and tomorrow we'll eat my son.' 29 So we cooked my son and ate him. The next day I said to her, 'Give up your son so we may eat him,' but she had hidden him."

2007-05-30 20:26:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The Old Testament were barbaric days. There would be wars and battles and one side would win. No matter how you can sit on your can now and think battles could be avoided back then.

When the side of right wins there was rejoicing. The side of right is with God.

2007-05-30 20:27:25 · answer #7 · answered by WhyNotAskDonnieandMarie 4 · 0 5

(paraphrased) to him that hath more will be given, to him that hath not, that which he hath will be taken away. (Also Jay Hoos)

2007-05-30 20:35:26 · answer #8 · answered by totamed 3 · 0 0

He was talking about Babylon, and how she would be despoiled,with your own treatment with which you treated us. It was meant for Babylon not for us.

2007-05-30 20:30:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

i have that shirt
your avatar

2007-05-30 20:29:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers