Attention Willaim R and "Are Evolutionists Credible?"?

Question

Concerning:

"When you consider that claims such as "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" and then have frauds like Haekel modify drawings and add fish gills to embryos to justify his fuhrer's "ethnic cleansing". When vestigal organs once claimed as useless (such as the appendix) are later found essential. When "apemen" such as Nebraska man (pig tooth), Piltdown man (hoax based on human skullcap and orangutan's jaw), and Ramapithecus (extinct orangutan) are presented as missing links. Makes me wonder what else evolutionists are trying to pass as reliable science. "

ARE YOU AWARE THAT "ONYTOGENY RECAPITUALTES PYLOGENY" WAS DISCREDITED ABOUT 100 YEARS AGO???

EVERY BIOLOGIST KNOWS THAT ONYTOGENY DOES NOT RECAPITUALTE PYLOGENY.

Answer 1

I don't base any of my beliefs on any of the things you just listed. I had never even heard of them. Until I looked it up I didn't even know what ONTOGENY (you spelled it wrong) was.

I wasn't aware that the appendix was essential. Could you list the article that this is in?

I have no idea where humans evolved from. We could have evolved from bats rather than apes. I don't know. But there are obvious links between lots of creatures.

As for vestigial structures why is it that whales have floating leg and foot bones? If they did not evolve why are those there?

I don't see why Christians are so adamant that evolution is false. It is impossible and there is no proof that a man suddenly appeared on earth before all other living things.

Maybe scientists can not YET prove their theories because the evidence is only beginning to develop.

But Christians can not prove any of the claims of intelligent design. NONE. Christianity is FAITH BASED. That means that you have to blindly accept a book written from third hand information more than a thousand years ago.

I am not saying ID did not happen and I have attended church every week for my entire life. I go because I would like to believe that that was possible. But until someone proves anything I will be an evolutionist.

Answer 2

Don't forget the bloodshed an evolutionary mindset leaves behind.Remember,death is supposed to be helping out the human race.You know,that survival of the fittest thing.Death and suffering doesn't sound too swift to me.So much for that Utopian society that never showed up.You know the one that Karl Marx,Joseph Stalling,Leon Trotsky,and Adolf Hitler were killing people for.When it was all said and done.Totals up to about 100,000,000 deaths.That's not counting Columbine and Virginia Tech.How many more school shootings will it take for people to realize the "goo- to- you" philosophy is not mentally healthy,and brings death and suffering?

Answer 3

There are a lot of puzzle pieces out there. Scientists are attempting to find an 'unorthodox' answer. Its all speculation... just as the catholic religion.
We will never no the answer... and probably won't know the answer when evenwe die.
But there is nothing wrong with trying to figure it out, in a different perspective?

Answer 4

But you see the fact that scientests are okay with people disproving their theories makes them much more credible than religious folk who just can't see that all those animals can fit on that boat that couldn't be that big and still sail.

Answer 5

Yeah, I think the most recent thing from his rant that was still considered 'good science' was in the twenties. But you know, science and evolutionary theory haven't moved much in eighty years (rolleyes).

Answer 6

Now, now. Surely you realize that the ONLY scientific arguments creationists *can* refute are the outdated, century old ones?

After all . . . to refute anything more recent, they'd have to read one of the science textbooks they've had banned!

Answer 7

Funny things about college level biology textbooks - they STILL use not only the discredited fraudulent work of Haekel, but the discredited pepper moth nonsense as well. I should know! I just took a course last year and when I confronted the prof about it, he had no answer.

Answer 8

lol
I'm a non-believer based on the philosophy of it-understanding it is unnatural. Good thing b/c I don't understand what the h*ll you guys are saying-not a scientist :-)

Answer 9

And what happy little religious site did you get that from then?

Answer 10

you make kitty ANGRY!!