If you do not let GOD into your heart you will never know he is around..GOD does not reveal himself to people that have a pad lock on there heart.
2007-05-30 02:51:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
13⤋
It does indeed seem "miraculous" that anything exists at all. But the mere fact that we use the world "miracle" to describe our amazement indicates a circular argument concerning "god", since only "god" performs "miracles". We are limited by our language and our knowledge in our ability to conceive other possibilities.
With all that being said, I don't think there is much harm in using this argument as a rationale for believing in the existence of some supernatural creator. However, if you then make the leap to use the argument as "proof" that the Bible is an accurate description of the supernatural creator, then you have made a big logical fallacy.
2007-05-30 03:06:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jim L 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
First of all, humans are not the most intricate beings on our planet (there are animals with many more chromosomes than us), much less the universe... we don't know what else is out there. There are 100's of billions of stars in the milky way galaxy alone, and 100's of billions of galaxies just like our own. Explain why the universe had to be created by God? Simply because you cannot explain how it was created or whether it was created at all is not sufficient.
Years ago, people did not understand lightning. They attributed it to God or gods throwing lightning bolts about. Now we know it's a discharge of built up electric charge. They didn't understand electricity, they didn't know any better, so they explained it with 'god'. This is exactly what you're doing.
2007-05-30 02:55:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by 006 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Pride is a sin, or something. Humans aren't that great. Kittens are better. So are puppies. We are probably not the most intricate creatures in the univerese. Goldfish have more chromosomes than humans.
No, actually, that isn't proof of God's existence. Just because we aren't entirely sure about how life began, does not mean that there is a sentient, omniscient being who made us and placed us here. "God of the Gaps" is not a valid argument.
2007-05-30 02:55:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Before I even read the details of such a question, I know axiomatically that there is no real proof of any god's existence. Whatever you cite as proof, applies just as much to Ahuramazda, Allah, Baal, Brahma and such gods as to Moses' deity YHWH or Yahweh. It also applies to pantheism, agnosticism and atheism. You say something is a miracle, but many men disagree wtih you. You cannot use your dubious assumptions to prove other assumptions. That is quite illogical and thus proves nothing at all. I have heard such arguments amny times. None make sense. The universe did not have to be created by any god you name. Who created your god? I can answer that one, but you wouldn't like the true answer.
2007-05-30 03:07:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by miyuki & kyojin 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The fact that the Universe and everything in it exists merely suggests a Source. That Source IS. You can give that Source any name or description that pleases you, and all others have the right and ability to either accept or reject your name or description. Regardless of how many people accept or reject your Beliefs, it does not prove anything about the Source, it merely validates (or not) your Beliefs about the Source. The Source doesn't exist or not exist depending on whether you Believe or Disbelieve, the Source IS.
2007-05-30 03:13:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Champion of Knowledge 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
good judgment is yet a language human minds contrived to describe actuality in one of those fashion shall we are conscious of it. this is an statement of how issues artwork. finally, all a priori arguments together with this fail because it may so fairly be grew to develop into round. If life itself necessitates a author and god exists by utilising that argument god calls for a author. you do not basically get to weasel your way out of it by utilising claiming (with out information or reason) that your god is impervious from an same criteria you're utilising in attempt to prepare there is one.
2016-10-18 11:30:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, that's not proof. The pure and simple fact that we are here only proves that we are here. There is nothing in that fact that suggests causation.
God, if such an entity exists, does not appear to "care about his creation," but rather remains aloof and indifferent.
2007-05-30 03:19:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What makes God a single consciousness when nothing in the universe exists on its own? Humans are not true individuals. We are part of a collective consciousness.
2007-05-30 03:17:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep. The chance of the most simple, one celled bacteria forming is 1:100^100, and that's just for the proteins to line up in the correct order. Not to mention Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation among other things.
2007-05-30 03:06:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brent H 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, you are right. I don't know why anyone would want to assume that they are an accident of evolution. Where is the hope in that? I personally believe that God designed every single one of us the way he wants us to be. Now THAT makes me feel special, that gives me hope because I know God is in control. Here is a hard thing for most to swallow, but God is so in control that He uses even the most horrid and atrocious things for His predestined providential plan (yes, even killings and such, I know, it's horrible, but there's always a reason for it, somehow it'll work out for good.) All shall work out for the best. I've had terrible things happen to me and it all has worked out for the best, so I have faith.
God Bless
2007-05-30 03:01:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by crazyhayashi 2
·
0⤊
1⤋