Just have the ***** killed...they do that sorta **** all over the world.
Oh yeah, do his *** too........
2007-05-30 00:53:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by spjp p 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your laws should be changed. You need women's liberation.
Before women's liberation, the women in the USA didn't have any rights either. They do now, just as many as men, equal.
In the state of California,USA in divorce court the woman gets 50 percent of everything he owns, even if she is the adulterer and leaves him.
She will get the children if she is of sound mind and a good mother. She also gets child support and alimony. Personally I don't think this is always fair. Especially if she is the cheater.
2007-05-29 22:50:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
could desire to they be allowed? somewhat. Why with the aid of fact freedom is important... and because if he could be enticed... properly then his spouse merits greater useful, and the secretary does not... it somewhat is karmic justice in a manner. As for the shortcoming to sue, it fairly is a indian criminal issue, and not a dating issue, so it somewhat is the incorrect place to ask. whether this criminal subject is in all probability stemming from Indian subculture, and which will take some doing to alter. Is it properly certainly worth the attempt... yeah, i think of it may be super if the ex could desire to sue... regrettably i don't think of she could get plenty, she could desire to have the flexibility to sue her ex husband for help nevertheless. by potential of the way it is not suitable no count if it somewhat is authorized or not allowed human beings will do what ever the hell they desire while it involves love and intercourse... era.
2016-10-30 04:42:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Entice Away
2016-12-12 19:54:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think I need to move to India and hire a hot Bollywood actress type secretary and bang the ship out of her. Then she'll be madly in love with me and try to take me away from my future wife and kids. Oh boy, what a country.
2007-05-29 22:45:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hellz naw.
This sucks i hate the fact that these women cant get their own dag on man and that they need to entice/seduce married men. In return it is the mans job to stay interested in his wife. women are like switches it is a mans resposibility to turn that switch on in a marriage and keep it on.
2007-05-29 22:57:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think it was decided based on majority of indian women who were misused by their in laws by dowry and find new girl for son, if you live normally this does not arise " why such a law shall be imposed on me"?
2007-05-29 22:50:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by david j 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
that is rediculous, and any man who loves his wife and family would not do that, I dont care if the LAW says it is okay or not, because law is not god or morality...
I dont suggest it.
and if you have, you might want to start apologizing now....
2007-05-29 22:42:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by src8784 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats fair - in any law , and anyones book , marraige wrecking is frowned upon
2007-05-29 22:40:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by DSV 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do vote for justice.
2007-05-29 22:43:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by hy003002 5
·
0⤊
0⤋