Deep thought on the univerise what is the real answer?

Question

Did nothingness give up nothing for the sake of everything and did everything give up everything for the sake of nothing?

(meaning) the universe exist in space that is vast in nothingness nothing but a void and something was created in nothing so nothingness can have everything but did they both gain everything but yet nothing! But nothingness had the space for everything to dwell, and did everything had nothing to give nothing yet gave it everything?

OR IS IT THIS

they coexist alongside each other because TOGETHER they derive meaning and fulfilness.

Answer 1

If nothing existed by its self there would be no unmoved mover to make sense of the fact of change.

Answer 2

There is no 'real' answer, only speculation.