2007-05-29 19:49:16 · 21 answers · asked by Raven75 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Say what you will, but I like Hillary. If nothing else she will have Bill there for advise and Bill did get the budget under control if nothing else you have to admit that.
2007-05-29 20:10:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Gore has been following our nations' problems and formulating approaches and solutions for years; first as an office holder on the national level (House, Senate, Vice President), and then as an environmental activists. There's no candidate with as much high level national level experience, and there's no candidate who is as intellectually curious and rational.
2007-05-29 21:00:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
we'd desire to do something, and quickly. So if it is going to paintings in the fast term, it truly is a step in the remarkable direction. We spent 10 billion a month in Iraq, it truly is the reason we are in this mess. The least we are in a position to do is spend an equivalent volume on our own usa for a substitute. Our infrastructure is collapsing, we haven't any selection. FYI... who replaced into the president who took the photograph voltaic panels off the White domicile roof? think of it helped the coal marketplace?
2016-10-09 03:01:00 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is too easy to see the trees instead of the forest. The politicians are picking subjects that are easy to answer but are not looking at the issues that affect those subjects. It is easier to come up with a universal health care program but what is harder is to solve the problems that lead to the failure of the present system. No health care program will be able to work as long as we have the excessive costs in health care. We can't solve the Iraq war without solving our own issues of terrorism and respect. You can't solve immigrants without addressing the issues of border control and relations with Mexico. You can't solve the political problems without solving election reform and lobbying corruption. There is no one candidate that addressing the hard issues. They are giving window dressing.
2007-05-30 01:27:03 · answer #4 · answered by ustoev 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even though it's still very early, I really like where Ron Paul is going. I like his ideas. And, I am looking forward to seeing him in future debates, including the upcoming one, on June 5th.
Also, I am looking forward to hearing Obama speak. He has some good ideas, that sound nice, but I am interested in hearing how he plans on implementing these ideas.
2007-05-29 21:29:14 · answer #5 · answered by SweetMahogany 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like a couple of things from a few of them. I like Ron Paul the most so far. Though he has a few way out there ideas even I am not totally into.
2007-05-29 19:54:42 · answer #6 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
None, some are just better than others, and I really don't think all of our nations problems can be "fixed" any longer. They certainly don't have to continue on the downward spiral they are on!
2007-05-29 19:52:45 · answer #7 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
None of them have any freaking clue as to what would be a good solution for fixing our nation's problems.
2007-05-29 20:12:55 · answer #8 · answered by Emma 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mr. Obama...he seems very true to his word. And i think he isnt a coward that wants to run away from our problems. But on the same note, i think he will not be war happy.
2007-05-29 19:53:06 · answer #9 · answered by Ryan G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mike Gravel
2007-05-29 19:51:09 · answer #10 · answered by The real Ed-Mike 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Unfortunately, Jon Stewart is NOT running for president.
2007-05-29 19:53:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋