English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-29 17:37:17 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

the pendulum.

2007-05-29 17:49:05 · answer #1 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 3 0

The role of weapons in the cold war was deterrence. This was based on the doctrine known by the acronym MAD or Mutually Assured Destruction.

The simplest of possible scenarios was an armoured invasion of West Germany by the Warsaw Pact (the former Soviet Union and its Eastern European allies - Poland Hungary Romania etc..). The weight of conventional forces of the Warsaw Pact outnumbered those of NATO and would have overwhelmed NATO forces, so the West would have resorted to single warhead Tactical Battlefield Nuclear weapons to stop the advance, while reinforcements were rushed in from the USA. The expected response from the Soviets would have been to launch strategic nuclear weapons against the US, France and Britain, to forestall such reinforcing, causing the US, France and Britain to retaliate with their strategic arsenal against the Soviets. Targets on both sides would have been missile silos, military bases and important cities, thus after such an exchange not much would be left.

2007-05-29 18:00:27 · answer #2 · answered by Uncle Vanya 1 · 0 0

Deterrence was the role of nuclear weapons. Neither side wanted to fight because of the damage that would be inflicted. If a nuclear exchange had occurred, there could be no winner. If you are dead, you can't win.

2007-05-29 18:28:00 · answer #3 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 0 0

The chilly conflict isn't long long gone, in accordance to best Minister Putin, he's attempting to unfold this variety of effective judgment, by potential of improving tensions in South united states of america. President Hugo Chavev is inspired by potential of Russia's real KGB agent. The chilly conflict era and Putin and all of us like him will fail miseably. technologies strikes suggestions in nanoseconds, flying planes and crusing ships over worldwide places, delivery missles returned and forth chilly conflict type is antiquated. It turns into much greater antiquated the as minutes tick off the clock. consequently, the efficacy of chilly conflict procedures don't have the performance to tip ability one way or yet another. The magic extensive variety is 311. in step with protection rigidity readiness analyze, it may take 311 nuclear tipped missles to strike, then counter strike. with the aid of fact many missles are sea based, some are air and others land based, the variety of suggestions for protection rigidity leaders be on offensive creates the subject, the perfect protection is offense. progressively greater, nuclear weapons are offensive weapons in the scheme of issues, moreso than shielding weapons. Who can look after a nuclear strike? Who can pull the set off first? all of us with stated features. The newly minted treaty reduces U.S. and Russian stockpiles to 1500 nuclear tipped conflict heads. as quickly as consumated, between 2 worldwide places it fairly is 3000 missles, if ever fired their could be not something left. different the two leathal suggestions that efficiently kill, is chemical and organic and organic brokers on the top of a missle. Their is not any scarcity of one's know-how to execute mass destruction. Nuclear weapons could have a dwindled function and no u . s . could be left handicapped to bomb a continent and kill human beings in biblical proportions.

2016-10-30 04:22:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

What WAS the role? Peace trough Superior firepower!

2007-05-29 17:53:08 · answer #5 · answered by Amanda B 4 · 0 0

MAD Mutual Assured Destruction

2007-05-29 18:00:00 · answer #6 · answered by The real Ed-Mike 3 · 1 0

What cold war? Figure that out, and re-phrase your question.

2007-05-29 17:41:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

he who has most has the best chance to win. it's kind of like poker chips.

2007-05-29 17:54:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The threat of "warming" it up.

2007-05-29 17:40:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers