2007-05-29 16:47:00 · 23 answers · asked by Anna G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Anna----I am sick to death of the tricky antics of the Clintons -her an billy are both career politicians and lawyers--------she wants to take our guns away----she wants socialized medicine-----and the state to rear our children-------she sways like a reed in the wind at the change of a poll or if confronted by a special interest group-------she is friends with the worst of the worst-------------if she gets in----------everyone will be very very sorry
2007-05-29 17:23:04 · answer #1 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Clinton -her negatives:
1. She was lenient when Bill Clinton was philandering,
2. Changes her stance on critical issues like Iraq war,
3. Gender might be a disadvantage as a woman, and
4. She might just win because of the network of fundraisers she inherited from Bill Clinton.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Hillary Clinton will likely win.
2007-05-29 19:32:41 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Socialized health care.
2. She'll vote to send us into wars, then say that the war was a bad thing, emboldening our enemies. Then she'll refuse to fund our troops over there, but won't say her vote for the war was a bad thing.
3. Unmitigated support for abortion, including partial birth abortion.
The list goes on.
Take off the last name "Clinton" and ignore her gender, and no one would've ever voted for her.
2007-05-29 17:11:04 · answer #3 · answered by Kenny S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If she wins we'll still be in the clinton/ bush years I want to move on.I'm sick of the country being split we need a unifier not more of the same division.
2007-05-29 17:11:40 · answer #4 · answered by Amy m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She can't stick to a decision on anything. She sticks her finger in the wind to see which way she should feel on any particular day. She is loud and obnoxious not to mention there are many questionable incidents from her past. AND we absolutely DO NOT WANT Billy back in the White House giving him another shot at the poor interns. And yes, she is a socialist.
2007-05-29 16:53:52 · answer #5 · answered by Cinner 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
1. She is a woman, so ought not to even vote, let alone be in political office.
2. Too many people are opposed to her personally and philosopically. Face it, she's a flaming liberal.
3. If the 80's were "the decade of greed", then the 90's were the decade of sleeze.
2007-05-29 16:51:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
She is married to Clinton
2007-05-29 16:49:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Same old, same old. Career politician. Keep the same desructive industrial ball bouncing. We need fresh blood, people who know what the definition of " unalienable right to life" means, and will work to protect this plannet. We cannot survive without it!
2007-05-29 16:58:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She is far to liberal for the oval office. She is against immigration reform and want to automatically make illegals legal in our country. She also is fighting for illegal aliens to be able to attend college. I would rather see Obama run as the democratic nominee.
2007-05-29 16:50:40 · answer #9 · answered by Peanut Butter 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
People think she is the b-word. Aside from that, I don't know. She has some good ideas, but some say it's socialist thinking. The thing is, regardless of if she wins or not, if everything she wants to happen happens, the country would be in a better place. People seem to hate her but I don't know why. The country flourished during Clinton's reign, another Clinton will help our country a lot if I am correct in my thinking.
2007-05-29 16:50:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 7⤋