Best Answer to the first lib that can give me an actual impeachable offense George Bush Committed...?

Question

and here is the kicker... with proof! Find me the link or the statement or the event... anything... anything at all... c'mon... help your Senators and Congressmen out... they obviously don't know much about political law since they haven't been able to charge him with an impeachable offense yet... however, since I see all the well educated folks on Y/A calling out for his impeachment they must have the answer their leaders are searching for.

So... help these guys out! I will forward all the factual answers to Nancy Pelosi...

Nice try JP... try reading your own source..

I'll help out... it says...

"During the 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." The British claim has not been substantiated with hard evidence, however the British Government continues to stand by its initial assessment. Critics claim the statement in the speech was a reference to the documents.

So... the President can't rely on our allies intelligence? He, like many of your party leaders believed the same evidence. Also, Yellowcake has never been disproved either.

WMD's was not the only reason we went to war... it was one of a dozen... and does Mustard Gas count as a WMD? Saddam sure killed thousands with that stuff! And where on earth do you get your 650,000 Iraqi's number? Rosie?... the actual number is about 65,000..

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/

Wow.. Pamela! I guess the 10 points go to you...

frug... please learn what an impeachable offense is before attempting to answer... and stop drinking the kool aid.... I can only repeat this this last time in this question... Bush did not lie... he had all the intelligence everyone else had... He also ha 17 UN resolutions...

Oh... and yes... I do believe in torturing a few terrorists who are murdering hatemongars that would kill your American butt in a second despite your hugging and welcoming him into the country, if it would say even one American's life. Thats why you leaving the protecting and the tough decisions to the men...

Hypofocus... FDR conducted wire-taps durring WWII all the time... during wartime the President has the power to do this. Under the patriot act further solidifies this and the wiretaps are against those who are know "friends" of the insurgents and the are overseas taps... why do people have such a problem with gathering intelligence for our safety. Wasn't everyone calling for that during 9/11? And no... the dems hold no restraint... their hatred for Bush is out of control and given the chance they would impeach ASAP... That was even one of Pelosi's platforms for gaining power... to impeach Bush... end the war... and lower gas prices.... go Pelosi go

Now Jessica... your no lib... but your closer than anyone else.... and I agree with the border issue... what the heck happened to him?

Schmorg... every little "talking point" you have spewed out is all made up and speculative at best.... the classic... "throw anything and everything against the wall and see what sticks." Problem is... NONE OF IT STICKS! and George didn't have to order anyone killed to silence them.... unlike when all of Billy's "friends" started waking up dead.

Answer 1

He's not defending our country against invaders. He is encouraging people to break our laws. He caused Ramos to get beat up by not pardoning him for doing his job.

Pelosi won't do anything. She an insult to the great state of CA. The problem of impeaching the moron is the bigger moron would become Pres.

I used to support Bush but since he has become such a traitor to our country I can't support him. Yes, I'm a Conservative!

Answer 2

REPLY TO VOTINGISUSELESS: the CIA form of torture doesn't harm the person in anyway. Waterboarding just drips water down the person for less than 30 seconds, but somehow makes the person feel like they are drowning. It is an affective tool that only causes some discomfort to the victim. It has worked very effectively on interrogation and it doesn't call for inhumane acts. Also if Bush is bad then all the European countries are bad. Britan France etc. all have thousands of cameras throughout their country spying on their entire country. Also no bush isn't committing impeachable offenses REPLY TO NO TO D: Andrew Jackson. He disobeyed hid duty as president. When the Supreme court ordered that the Cherokee nation could not be relocated by Georgia Andrew Jackson did nothing to stop the people of Georgia. And in the consititution it states that the president is required to uphold the laws of the constitution.

Answer 3

He ordered domestic wiretaps without a warrant, a violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Fourth Amendment. He has admitted it.

"In January 2006, the Congressional Research Service released two legal analyses concluding that:

"...no court has held squarely that the Constitution disables the Congress from endeavoring to set limits on that power. To the contrary, the Supreme Court has stated that Congress does indeed have power to regulate domestic surveillance... the NSA surveillance program... would appear to be inconsistent with the law."

In addition, the American Bar Association, in February 13, 2006, issued a statement denouncing the warrantless domestic surveillance program, accusing the President of exceeding his powers under the Constitution. Their analysis opines that the key arguments advanced by the Bush administration are not compatible with the law. David Kris and five former FISC judges, one of whom resigned in protest, have also voiced their doubts as to the legality of a program bypassing FISA."

-from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movement_to_impeach_George_W._Bush

As to the fact that the Democratic leadership hasn't tried to impeach him - it doesn't mean they don't have a case, only that they are practicing restraint. It's about time we had some of that in Congress, don't you think?

Answer 4

So you don't think lying to the American people and the rest of the world about false pretenses for war is impeachable?

And you don't have a problem with the use of torture?

Or holding prisoners of war indefinitely with no evidence and no charges being made?

So in your mind he would have to do something really bad like like lying about getting a BJ?

Answer 5

I bet you can't get a real answer, though I am curious as
to how jpferrierjr can say that Bush forged the documents
his link states that it came from Britain, and the British still
support it as real.

No 10 points for him

There are no impeachable offenses other wise the
Democrats would have already done so, to get back
for Clinton and garner more votes for themselves.

EDIT: schmorgan, If any of those charges were TRUE
why are Bush and Cheney still walking around?

Answer 6

hmmm, outsmarting the great global warming scientist and inventor of the internet

outsmarting... Ho chi minns newphew john kerry

creating the most incredible economy the world has ever known

getting Al qaeda bogged down in a quagmire in Iraq....no terrorist attacks here since 911!!!

Answer 7

To the poster that implied that Bush was responsible for the death of 650,000 Iraqis: Was your source Rosie O'Donnell on the "View"?

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/database

What was Rosie's source? The NY Times Tabloid?

With respect to domestic spying without a warrant: In 1993 when the WTC suffered the first attack, Clinton enacted domestic spying without a warrant. The NY Times called it a 'necessity'. On Sept 11, 2001 the WTC was attacked again resulting in 3000 deaths. Bush reenacted domestic spying without a warrant - The NY Times called it 'illegal'.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/01/under_clinton_ny_times_called.html

The liberal media strikes again.

Answer 8

I know he can't be impeached....I would however like to find a way to fire him.

When people don't do the job the majority hired him to do there should be a way to terminate his employment.

Hired....legally....not stolen.

Answer 9

The Niger documents:

This document was used to make the attack on Iraq legal when no WMD's were found. This document was later found to be fake. A falsified letter by the Bush Administration that resulted in the death of over:

650,000 Iraqis
3,500 US

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery

10 points please!

Answer 10

leading the nation into a horribly wrong war based on lies is grounds for impeachment...not to mention all the other seedy stuff Bush has done...