But dont hold the Muslims who attacked America accountable for anything they've done?
2007-05-29 15:39:47 · 15 answers · asked by stepped on the Third Rail 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Right Beth....The President of the USA knew about 9/11 and just LET it happen. Have you considered counceling?
2007-05-29 15:45:16 · update #1
The questions was WHY isn't the religion of peace held accountable??? You just can't answer without an attack on America and our President....Bush is DEAD WRONG on a lot of things like the immigration bill, but, why can't you call out the radical wacko Muslims???? WHY???
2007-05-29 15:49:23 · update #2
Democratic Secular Socialists
they have nothing but lies, they can do nothing but point fingers, they are literally insane as the answers to your question proves.
The most amazing thing to me is there are people who are planning on detonating a nuclear device in the USA and the answerers to your question rather than dealing with this reality go off on the irrational hate bush thing. That is a serious case of displacement and paranoia.
I am surprised at the level of mental illness in our country.
2007-05-29 16:09:11 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They don't work for me.
It's not that I don't hold them accountable. The ones who actually did it are all dead. Bin Laden, who put it in motion, is beyond my reach.
It's Bush who has refused to even look for Bin Laden -- he preferred bombing a country that wasn't involved in retaliation.
I don't blame Bush for everything bad, I blame him for the consequences of his actions.
I thought conservatives were big on personal responsibility.
Why SHOULDN'T I blame him for the wrongs he's done? Isn't that part of accountability?
The difference between my attitude toward Bush and Bin Laden is, while I hold each accountable for their crimes in the sense of blaming them, Bin Laden isn't "accountable" to me, whereas Bush is.
I don't pay Bin Laden's salary.
He doesn't act in my name.
He was never hired to represent my interests.
But why don't you ask King George why HE doesn't hold Bin Laden accountable?
He's the one who blamed another guy entirely, and has refused to look for the guy who was behind 9/11.
2007-05-29 23:43:22 · answer #2 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Name a single liberal who has actually said "Bush is to blame for everything bad, but Muslims who attack America should get off the hook." You can't. It's bullshit.
2007-05-29 23:22:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes. The deluded fools who committed suicide while hijacking planes on 9/11 of six years ago were wrong. Get over it. They paid for their crime with their life on the day they committed it and there's not much more we can do against them.
Bush, on the other hand, has been President of the United States for six years. Throughout these six years, he has consistently made disastrous decisions and continues to do so, as far as he can get away with them. Bush has torn the credibility of the United States on the international stage to shreds, has sabotaged the U.S. economy, attacked every value the U.S. stands for and has made a mockery of his office. He has done more harm to this country than the 9/11 terrorists. 3/4 of the U.S. public do not trust him to do the right thing anymore, but unlike Nixon, he doesn't even have the decency to resign. Bush is to blame - not for everything - but for a hell of a lot of things he has done.
- not the least of which is to create a world in which terrorist recruiting and action is much MORE likely than before he took office.
2007-05-29 22:49:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
sure. but Muslims and terrorism aside Bush has spent the budget into spiraling deficit, appointed unqualified friends to high positions like the FEMA guy, No Child Left Behind is a failure, Clear Skies Act favors business and does not protect the environment, the enron scandel was directly linked to Bush & Cheney, and so on.
2007-05-29 22:46:04 · answer #5 · answered by Diggy 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I am not a liberal but if Bush is president who do you want to hold responsible for his policies. Did not Harry Truman say the buck stops here, if it is good enough for Harry it's good enought for W
2007-05-29 22:52:10 · answer #6 · answered by jean 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I WILL CALL THEM OUT! They are shameful cowards...they are responsible! Terrorists should be destroyed!
Here's today's latest terrorist video release...they are placing demands, taking credit for 911 and say they hate baby killers etc...these are new threats...
http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerindex?...
Thumbs down if you want..this is an ABC news release for TODAY! I didn't write it...I just gave you a link...watch it for yourself...
2007-05-29 22:45:30 · answer #7 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That would just make sense for them to blame themselves. Suck it up and own up to it. They voted for the war, now it's cut and run and Bush is committing war crimes and murder...Gee, kinda hypocritical aren't they?
2007-05-29 22:43:35 · answer #8 · answered by SillierKimmy! 3 · 6⤊ 3⤋
I think it is easier to blame someone else for their problems than to look in the mirror at themselves for the blame and the answers. excellent question.
2007-05-29 22:43:14 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
that's about the most ignorant question I've ever heard posted on here. You need to get out of the basement and turn Fox Noise off... there's a REAL world out there... far different from what Fox and Limbaugh tell you it's like.
2007-05-29 22:44:31 · answer #10 · answered by GOPanic Is Funny 2 · 3⤊ 6⤋