yea i mispelled some things in the question i think. lol im bored and curious.
2007-05-29 15:19:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Not in my world.
2007-05-29 15:27:48 · answer #1 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was a bit overacted in places, the scenery was great adn the music excellent.
It also depicted the destruction the two main characters wrought on the lives of everybody around them - especially their wives and children. They were not victims - they were incredibly selfish in acting out their affection and infatuation.
2007-05-29 16:50:08 · answer #2 · answered by Richard of Fort Bend 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course it was over-dramatised. he was playing a gay character.
2007-05-30 07:21:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without Lube? On a cold Night? With a drunken virgin? If anything he DOWNPLAYED it.
2007-05-29 15:56:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh my god not at all! Are you on crack? They didn't have any lube! I'd be on the floor crying and screaming!
2007-05-29 16:10:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
hmm, it depends i guess, but i would generally say no...
dont forget jake is an actor, whether or not he's gay, straight, bi, whatever...he was paid to do what was on the script.
2007-05-29 15:24:17 · answer #6 · answered by angie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was a movie. Of course it was overdramatized.
2007-05-29 15:24:04 · answer #7 · answered by tkdeity 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have liked to see more of it, honestly.
2007-05-29 16:54:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, not at all...if anything it was somewhat subdued in the movie.
2007-05-29 15:58:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
pretty realistic, especially considering....no lube!!!
yikes.
2007-05-29 15:35:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋