English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who would you NOT vote for president in '08? Give reasons. I am curious what people think.

2007-05-29 13:44:15 · 20 answers · asked by Jake T 1 in Politics & Government Elections

20 answers

Anyone named Clinton.

2007-05-29 14:06:51 · answer #1 · answered by FieryOutlaw 3 · 3 1

Out of the candidates from both parties, I would not vote for the following bunch:

Rudy Giuliani - His ego is the size of Texas and he uses 9-11 politically all the time, and I find that disgusting.

Tom Tancredo - Hes a bit of an idiot.

Sam Brownback - Hes more than a bit of an idiot.

John McCain - Hes not running as himself. I remember the real McCain from 2000, and thats not who we're seeing today.

Mitt Romney - You want to double Guantanamo? Kiss my vote goodbye

Mike Huckabee - He sends off a weird vibe. I never know if hes being serious or not.

Jim Gilmore - Hes a total moron.

Duncan Hunter - Didnt really impress me in any way. Just another typical politician.

Tommy Thompson - Not very smart. Idolizes Reagan and doesnt really seem to know why.

Hillary Clinton - Typical vote-whore that I wouldnt trust with a dog I didnt like.

Barack Obama - All show and no substance. Typical question-dodging, just like Hillary.

Joe Biden - Easily the stupidest out of all the Democratic candidates. Whoring for votes and not even doing it well.

Chris Dodd - Winner of the Golden Leash Award. Enough said.

Dennis Kucinich - Love the guy, but hes too much of an idealist to be President.

John Edwards - Good man, but he voted for the Iraq war, which was a judgement call, and I dont think anyone who voted for the war has the judgement to be President. Same goes for Biden, Dodd and Clinton.

2007-05-29 14:04:41 · answer #2 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 3 2

The main thing is VOTE. Vote for your choice,but don't vote a straight ticket.The politicians are counting on it.They would rather you not vote.We need to change the whole Congress and get rid of the long term incumbents that are on the take and corrupt .Congressmen ,once was a honorable position, now it's a sham .They want to pass this immigration bill,and 70% of the American citizens say NO.We want the borders closed and no amnesty and yet they want to pass it.Are they not supposed to listen to their constituents? It's all done in their stupid war between parties , control and greed.

2007-05-29 14:18:43 · answer #3 · answered by pretzgolf 5 · 0 0

Dem: Hillary - her beliefs are radical left-wing even for the Democratic party and she is not as good as Kerry was at building a public persona to hide her real self. Having her on the ticket is a sure-fire way of losing and the Democratic big-whigs know it. Where's Lieberman when you need him?

Repub: - GooGoo-lani : He'd make a better war lord or mob boss then he would a President. I really don't want two-way TVs or something similar so the untrustable citizens could be monitored. He has a callous disregard for the Constitution.

Lib: Any one (including Ron Paul). Isolationism is a sure-fire way to usher in WWIII.

2007-05-29 15:23:51 · answer #4 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 3 0

Not well-phrased, Bud, as the list is longer than it is from here to the moon!

But, just to keep it rollin' here, I'll give ya an obvious one from where I sit and that is Queen Hillary the Great herself. Too arrogant (she's ENTITLED to the presidency, don'tcha just know!), self-righteous, and has a 100-boxcar trainload of baggage trailing behind her. It would be entertaining to watch the Republicans savage her day after day but it wouldn't be a good thing for the country. So fer me it's Hillary Clinton, fer shure!

2007-05-29 13:51:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

wow that would take too much writing and you would be bored silly by the 2nd hour of reading. But I will give you a couple, John Edwards (the brek girl) he is too dumb for words. Hillary because she is too ruthless for words and for all the wrong reasons. Obama because his ears are too big and he doesn't have a clue how to be a leader or could never make a choice that would be right for the country but against his party. And pretty much any liberal or Republican who would raise taxes and not cut spending just to please his "money people". Darn that doesn't leave many ( if any) to choose from. But I would compromise my ideals a bit if we could find someone no matter of race or gender who could unite this country and somehow get them to realize that the war on terror is 1. REAL, and 2. NOT OUR FAULT

2007-05-29 14:04:10 · answer #6 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 2 1

Mitt Romney

2007-05-29 14:06:52 · answer #7 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1 0

Hillary Clinton.....

She wants to ban weapons nation wide and reduce the US military. She would only allow weapons that are specified in the constitution which are revolvers and single shot bolt action rifles.... no more semi automatics, no more assault rifles, no more magazine fed anything......

That is obviously a woman who has never had to defend anything she owns, but i am willing to bet if she were ever mugged or had her home broken into she would change her mind real quick.

Every American has a right to defend themselves, their family, and their property. Every person who votes for her is saying that they are willing to give up that right.

If you take guns away from law abiding citizens, you are making it that much easier for the criminals to thrive.

Also, she has never served in the military so she has absolutely no idea what is best for the troops....
But it is my belief that any president of this great nation should be retired from the Armed Forces. If they are going to direct our military, they should serve in it first.

2007-05-29 13:54:49 · answer #8 · answered by Stevie 7 · 4 1

Woot! I relatively have voted him the final 3 elections. I wish extra human beings knew approximately him and that he replaced into taken extra heavily. i like his concepts, he could be appropriate for our u . s . a .. this is a shame that the lots are the asses and could in basic terms vote crimson or blue.

2016-11-23 16:09:28 · answer #9 · answered by ganpatram 3 · 0 0

I would not vote for Dr. No: Ron Paul. I am one of his disenchanted constiuents in South Texas and I've had it with his voting No on every bill that is presented. EVERY BILL. Not just ones he doesn't like. EVERY BILL. It's embarrasing and not reflective of the needs and wants of his home district. I certainly don't want that applied on a national level.
I also would not vote for Hillary The Hun. I prefer my presidents to be genteel, civilized, have a moral compass, and unwilling to overlook betrayal, all of the things Hillary is NOT.

2007-05-29 14:36:25 · answer #10 · answered by Sally B 6 · 1 2

Hillary

2007-05-29 13:49:07 · answer #11 · answered by porcerelllisman q 4 · 6 0

fedest.com, questions and answers