I don't believe he did.
2007-05-29 12:56:53 · 13 answers · asked by Jason C 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I need reliable sources.
2007-05-29 12:58:15 · update #1
what about when that piece of excrement Kennedy had the ballots stolen so he could beat Nixon.
2007-05-29 13:05:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There isn't any! I'd like to know why libs persist in this delusion even though several of their own organizations did a re-count, probably more than once, and found that he not only won the election, but he won the popular vote. New York Times, and the ACLU are just two that figured this out.
Don't you find it interesting that the few libs that answer the question are just insulting and still don't answer the question? They're amazing, aren't they? Fascinating creatures!
2007-05-29 13:35:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry i visit steer off the undertaking rely a sprint. money is a large component simply by fact it determines how plenty campaigning they might do. yet they nevertheless might desire to convince the country that they are the guy we want as pres. in keeping with subject concerns and competance. Obama has the main competence and a large presence. McCain knows conflict and is conservative and he admits that he understand no longer something approximately economics and he does not understand the thank you to apply a working laptop or workstation, heavily. i in my opinion think of it truly is needed that we teach that we are in a position to go with a black guy in this usa. i think the comparable approximately electing a women. that's what you call progression.
2016-10-09 02:26:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where is the evidence he won the 2000 election through vote fraud?
I don't believe he did!
THANK GOD!
2007-05-29 13:13:50 · answer #4 · answered by Philip H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
None. He won it square, but not fair. He sure threw a lot of mud. That is all I can say. All the mud, all the last seven year's B/S is why I am ready to depart the "Grand Old Party". Even Nixon could not do that. But Cheney and Bush? I have had enough.
2007-05-29 13:04:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm still waiting for proof that he cheated to win the 2000 election. The Democrats are STILL whining about that.
2007-05-29 13:01:48 · answer #6 · answered by srdongato2 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
he won fair and square unlike clinton splitting the republican vote in half with perot
2007-05-29 14:07:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's bcause you're too much of a coward to do the homework...or too lazy....let's see
1--computer glitches causing the vote to go for bush
2--republicans throwing out voter registration cards
those are just two example....google it and do some homework
2007-05-29 13:06:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What a rhetorical tour de force! This is like me demanding, "Where is the evidence that the Apollo missions were faked? I don't believe they were."
2007-05-29 13:01:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
liberals don't need proof.
They simply can't imagine how a baby killing, fear-mongering, tax-hungry, socialist candidate who was weak on terror and extremely boring could have possibly lost the election.
2007-05-29 13:02:46 · answer #10 · answered by Sleeck 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋