That just typical Democrat buying votes BS. It's socialism.
2007-05-29 11:29:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by libstalker 4
·
2⤊
5⤋
The funny thing is, she's got the right message, but its directed at the wrong country!
If this were Peru or Bolivia, countries where capitalism has done nothing to elevate the living standard of the indigenous population, (and actually harmed them greatly in some cases) she'd be correct by observing: ""There is no greater force for economic growth than free markets. But markets work best with rules that promote our values, protect our workers and give all people a chance to succeed, Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies."
Do you ever notice politicians like Hillary never give any specifics? Of course, the media is often to blame for that. The most nauseating political debate was between then-President George H. Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton. Each candidate only mouthed trite old platitudes. It seemed like each candidate's purpose was just to survive the "debate" without giving the unprincipled media the one little sound bite it needed to ridicule one of them.
Hillary has some very wacked-out Socialist ideas. Didn't you love her Socialist health care plans? Let me clue in everyone as to why the Democrats want Socialized medicine: power. They lost theire welfare state, Social Security doesn't seem to be doing very well, so now they are looking into another way to get a stranglehold on voters. I can tell you exactly how the Socialized medicine debacle would play out.
At its inception, the press will laud how everyone finally has the right to visit a doctor and not lose their life savings for lack of health insurance.
The Socialized medicine honeymoon will last about six months, and then stories will begin creeping up all around the country about how mismanaged everything is. There will be hundreds of stories of abuse, fraud, and deplorable medical care by doctors who just don't care anymore.
Next, people will finally come to the realization that medical care is indeed being rationed. When it's "free", everyone is going to try and demand the most expensive testing possible. Every mother of a kid who twisted his ankle is going to demand an MRI. Machinery costing millions of dollars will begin breaking down from over use.
The tens of millions of fat people will demand that their "obesity disease" be treated with the most costly prescriptions, and millions will demand expensive stomach stapling.
Just as it happens every day in Argentina, girls will be lined up around the block to get their noses fixed, or have their breats altered. Remember, it's all "free".
Yeah, nanny Hillary is going to have a real blast if she gets her Socialized medicine, but it's going to put us all on the sick list.
2007-05-29 11:49:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
According to a March 2001 report, Selected Staff and Board Members of the Scowcroft Group included the following people:
The Scowcroft Team
Brent Scowcroft
Kevin Nealer
Colin Powell
Condoleezza Rice
Richard Haass
Ken Juster
Howard Baker
Carla Hills
Robert Strauss
Lawrence Eagleburger
"...The Scowcroft Group is managed directly by Brent Scowcroft, former National Security Advisor to President George H.W. Bush and Gerald Ford. Our principals bring extensive experience in business and government coupled with extraordinary regional expertise in Asia, Latin America, Africa, Western and Eastern Europe, Russia, and the Middle East. Our team of bipartisan professionals has demonstrated prowess in the political economy of emerging markets, and strong relationships with key political and industry decision-makers.
Our resources are our people, in Washington, and abroad. Our principals and network of consultants reach into governments and businesses worldwide..."
2007-05-29 11:48:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Whitest_American 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
"There is no greater force for economic growth than free markets. But markets work best with rules that promote our values, protect our workers and give all people a chance to succeed," she said. "Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies."
She's right about this. I don't like Hillary for other reasons and she is definitely not socialist by any means. Countries like Swedan, Norway and Finland have this as their motto and as their policies in their country. Before they developed this in the early part of the 20th century, they had rampant starvation and poverty. Immediately, there was a change in quality of life for all and quality of education, quality of healthcare for all their population, not just the rich. What's wrong with that. Why do you cons think that people have to pull themselves up by the bootstraps of starvation to be considered a valuable citizen. Instead, think of it as creating many valuable citizens by allowing people to use their full potential to create a better society so they don't have to just think about their next meal or where and how they are going to get their kid's medicine. What they have is practical, efficient and a much more humane system. What's wrong with that?
2007-05-29 11:32:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
What else do you expect from "It takes a village" Hillary? She couldn't even raise her kid without some village helping out, whatever that means. How is she expected to run the country? Run it into the ground is what she wants to do.
2007-05-29 14:24:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Princess of the Realm 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
She's right, kiddies...we're all in this together whether you choose to recognize or accept it.
You think you're not already paying for the health care of the entire country? Think again.
2007-05-29 11:48:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
she would say or do anything to advance her career. i believe that she hate's our country, and the military, and she is not a nice person. i read where a former arkansas state trooper stated that she and her husband had used the n word many times and they laughed about it. i do not trust her.
2007-05-29 11:59:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by out for justice. 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I heard that today and nearly puked. The probelm is most of the young people here in America believe that what she is sayingy is the best way for the country. I think we should raise the voting age to 25. That way to vote you would have had to had a job and supported yourself and realize that world isn't here to provide for you.
Kids today are spoiled and think that we owe them something for being born. And Chillary is playing right into them. Promising to take care of them from cradle to grave.
2007-05-29 11:31:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by LIL_TXN 4
·
3⤊
4⤋
Never really needed proof of that
2007-05-29 11:30:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tall Chicky 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
No surprises. Most of us know.
She'll NEVER get into that office... EVER!!!
2007-05-29 11:29:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋