If Al Gore ran for president in 2008, would you vote for him? If so, please do something to urge him to run. America made a mistake electing Bush. In my opinion, that was just a fluke victory. With Bush we are a rock that doesn't move. Al Gore would give that rock wheels (Metaphorically speaking, of course.) Sign a petition at draftgore.com or algore. org. Would you vote for a better tomorrow?
2007-05-29 10:16:19 · 19 answers · asked by Holy_one 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Even as a conservative I truly believe that Gore running would be good for the political process and the country as a whole. The main reason being that right now the Democrats do not have an actual primary election. It is simply a coronation for Hillary with no candidate besides her actually trying to win. At least Gore would give her a real run for her money (and probably be a more electable candidate in the GE).
2007-05-29 11:44:08 · answer #1 · answered by AJ242 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
look at a number of those appropriate Wing Zombies responding to this question. The Democrats and Republicans have not got a lesser of two evils this election. the two events have not got lots going for them. confident, Al Gore ought to run. truthfully everyone seems to be frightened of exchange. human beings can;t comprehend what he says because of the fact they worry to settle for something they do no longer comprehend. He exchange into robbed in ninety 8 and could provide it yet another shot. i could choose for to renowned each and every of the haters who positioned down Gore provide some motives to help Giuliani. What has this guy finished to tutor he can run a rustic? He exchange right into a mayor, this is a diverse animal whilst in comparison with the full usa.
2016-10-06 06:44:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore is a phony with his global warming scam. He has been out of politics since 2000. He did not know what was going on then. The people in his own home state did not vote for him in 2000. Get the message?
2007-05-29 10:20:43 · answer #3 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Could Al Gore campaign and still be "green" at the same time? I think not. He would be using a lot of carbon.
2007-05-29 10:18:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's be clear. Bush has never been elected. Each of his elections were stolen, or flim flamed to achieve victory.
As for Gore, I'd vote for him.
2007-05-29 10:34:23 · answer #5 · answered by Arnold M 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, I won't vote for him.
Remember, as his books mentioned many times before, he will increase gas tax up to 300% or more.
I am not able to pay $8 dollars a gallon, on top of all the mess that he may create...
2007-05-29 10:23:07 · answer #6 · answered by DeadManWalking 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Actually America never elected bush, it was the republicans on the super sucky supreme ct that put him in. The great part about global warming is that the first place to go under water will be Florida. ha ha ha. Idiots voted for it, they deserve what they get.
2007-05-29 10:19:48 · answer #7 · answered by jxt299 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I probably would, but I don't think he should run, as the democrats have other candidates with a better chance of winning this time.
2007-05-29 10:20:11 · answer #8 · answered by Henry R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
heck no, he would kill America (metophorically or not) paying too much time to this global warming fluke. I am against Bush as well but only because he is showing his liberal horns.
As if paying for the legalized illegals welfare wont be enough to brake americans banks, he would put taxes on driving cars to work to pay for these illegals.
Gore = bad idea.
Michael savage please run. 10 million of us are on you're side!
2007-05-29 10:22:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Al Gore is not the answer!
2007-05-29 10:24:02 · answer #10 · answered by jeb black 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋