American troops in Iraq??

Question

Who supports hillary clinton's decisicon to evacuating the troops in Iraq? you can explain why if you like, I am supporting her becuz the war in iraq it was the "bushes game" to put their hand on iraqs oil the "bushes" war is not americas war, the only people who benefited out of this war are the bushes and theyre oil empires and corporations, but they are trying to make all of america pay for it, and america has already payed dearly. I am just saying my opinion and u are free to urs thanks for your time.

Answer 1

they aren't doing America one bit of good by being there...bring them home

Answer 2

Hillary voted correctly, but she is pretty late to change her mind.

She had supported the war earlier and would probably be sympathetic when some business or other calls up to ask for military action if she is president.

And then conservatives will scream just as they did when Bill bombed Afghanistan, Sudan, & Serbia.

The mistake some conservatives make is they think becauses someone dislikes Bush, they automatically think Democrats are as pure as the driven snow. They are not. The fault of the Democrats though is that many court and answer to many of the same financial interests as the GOP, which is why our trade and foreign policy is largely the same regardless of which party controls the White House.

Answer 3

How about you just give all the oil to Iran and China so they can just wipe us clean of the globe. Will you protest China in Iraq when we leave. China in South America, China in Mexico with our open border, China in Africa, Venezuela has 30 long range jet fighters that can fly over our border in a day and they all have satellite jamming capabilities. Which means all communications, including cell phones, would be gone in an instant. (this would screw up airport flights in a bad way) Meanwhile China has supplied Brazils navy with long range missiles and is currently discussing a new canal through Mexico that would put the panama canal out of business. These forces can be part of a first strike that can weaken America and depending on how many enemy troops have come over our porous border we can be devastated within hours. So lets just wait and see what the next super power has in store for us while we watch American Idol.

Answer 4

I like working in Iraq it is awesome. I talk to the troops every day. That is way more than Hillary. Yesterday two soldiers were in thier PT outfits and throwing a football with one of the guys from India that works on the FOB. It was awesome, the Indian guy couldn't throw, but the soldiers were having fun and so was he. These are some of the best, most diverse, and bravest young people that you will ever meet. Why pull out? They want to be here until the mission is finished.

Answer 5

i think of it somewhat is a bad theory. US troops could desire to never have been there in the 1st place. looking and assisting to kill Saddam is basically yet another ploy to make it appear like they actually achieved something good there. whether, I even have spoken to Iraqis and that they say that killing Saddam has finished not something yet create greater chaos. there are a number of bombings and no protection exterior the golf green Zone, so no person is fairly risk-free. I do think of the U. S. government is to blame to repair the country that they destroyed out of their own lack of expertise and selfishness. I do exactly not comprehend how they could try this. Sending greater troops to be killed isn't a suitable answer. Bush and his advisors could desire to in my opinion bypass there and sparkling up their mess.

Answer 6

It sounds like you have bought in to the Democratic Party's game of controlling perception.

The war on terrorism's battlefield of Iraq has:

-Ousted an evil, atrocity committing dictator
-Saved millions of Iraqi lives
-Given all Iraqi's a voice in government (not just the Sunnis any more)
-Killed and captured many of the world's most wanted terrorists
-Destroyed Iraq's ability to create war against peaceful nations
-Removed Iraq as a safe haven for Terrorist orginizations
-Liberated (somewhat) Iraqi women
-Took the first step in stabilizing the world's most valuable energy supply
-Allowed sale of Iraqi oil to pay for infrastructure (rather than going in someones pocket)
-Allowed the UN to enforce existing Iraqi Agreements
-Regained a new respect for the ability and likelyhood of America to use its most powerful military in the world

I guess I only had time to name a few things.

Answer 7

The war in Iraq is illegal and immoral. It was started by our war mongering president for the purposes of war profiteering and the ill advised desire to "finish what Daddy started".. He planned to attack Iraq long before 9/11, which by the way has NOTHING to do with the war.

What amazes me is how many ignorant people believe Iraq was tied to 9/11.

Answer 8

Stay in the "beauty" category where you might know something.

This war is not about oil, it is about terrorism. IF Bush REALLY started this war for profit, the Democratic Congress would have his neck right now. That is called treason. But they're not. Instead, they simply disagree with the war, and there is nothing wrong with that.

However, calling it something it's not is ignorance, and it is NOT a war for profit.

Answer 9

May I suggest that you double-check Hillary's stance on evacuating our troops before you support her blindly?

While you are at it, check her record on "sending troops to Iraq" as well.

Answer 10

whether or not we pull out the troops does not make any difference, Iraq is a lost cause, so we might as well go home.

Answer 11

War for oil is an infantile uninformed statement. If we really just wanted the oil, we could have wiped out all the Iraqs by now and moved in our workers. Also, no one til now can show any proof that Bush is making money from the war so that for that reason you are either misinformed, stupid or a liar. Your pick.