English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just watched a clip of Rosie talking about building 7 and wondered if anyone agrees with her?

2007-05-29 08:46:56 · 16 answers · asked by Jasmine 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

16 answers

Ok, I heard this, let me ask you something, if you heard a huge explosion, what would be your immediate conclusion?

Bomb, right? So, when the guy said there was a bomb (no expert, he) he was probably coming to a logical conclusion, because prior to 911 no one had used a plane as a missile since WW II. As for her comment that he looked up and then saw the plane, was this the second building, first, was it one of those cases that people remember after they hear, imagined memories, especially during traumatic events, are not unheard of.

Was his testimony really "thrown out" of the 911 report? Prove that he isn't just some nutcase or give me a valid reason why, if we were involved in some big creepy conspiracy, we didn't just kill him, one measly person, after we supposedly killed some 3,000 other Americans.

I am so sick of people that think we were behind 911, in two words, PROVE IT!

P.S. I am not attacking you, just so fed up with Rosie, it is she that I am attacking.

Ciao

2007-05-29 08:53:51 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfgang92 4 · 2 0

Building 7 was pulled. This is a demolition term for a building that is wired with explosives to be detonated. The property lease owner of the world trade center admitted this on TV but we never saw the footage after 911. In his words, “there has already been so much death and destruction, let’s not wait any longer and the order was given to "pull it”".

The simple fact of the matter is, I worked in the World Trade Center and I'm a technical person and I can say that all of the buildings in the WTC where wired with explosives. This was done after the first bombing to prevent the buildings from falling over in the event of a bombing that would have been successful. The first bombing would have caused the building to fall over if the truck was positioned closer to the support structure in the parking garage.

There are several other facts about 911 that the American people will never know and with out a doubt in my mind, don't want to know. The pentagon was not struck by a plane as no aircraft parts where ever found and the original hole in the side of the building was only about 12 feet in diameter. This is the actual size of a bunker buster bomb that intended to destroy a portion of a structure. If you want to know the truth about 911, find the video “911 in Plane Site”. You will be shocked at what you see.

You can purchase a copy at:
http://www.911inplanesite.com/

Learn the truth for yourself.

2007-05-29 16:08:24 · answer #2 · answered by Christopher D 1 · 0 1

A Rosie Clip?!! Honey, if you want to know ANY of the truth, than you'd better stay far away from her! This is probably NOT on her blog, but she also said things like "fire doesn't melt steel" and "with 650,000 Iraqis dead, who are the terrorists [in Once she was called on it and confronted with the TRUTH that she was insinuating that the troops were the terrorists in Iraq, she went ballistic. She also has denied, I've watched her do this more than once, that she ever said or meant to say that she thinks Bush's administration was behind 9/11 and caused it. Yet she's got that nonsense on her blog, right?

Rosie doesn't know or care what the truth is. She makes things up as she goes along and will deny it vehemently when you confront her with the truth.

Here are a few legitimate links to the TRUTH about 9/11 including why the towers fell.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/2907_wtc.html
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=2
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

2007-05-29 16:02:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can hardly believe that someone on this panel agrees with dumb Rosie. Read a little and see the facts. Where are all the passengers of those planes if they did not go into the buildings?

2007-05-29 15:58:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The government could say termites caused building 7 to collapse and people would believe them. Bunch of Fascists being controlled by nationalism. Its said if you don't support Bush, then you are unpatriotic. Folly, since dissent is true patriotism.

Fascism has no room for dissent.

P.S. Rosie only knows bits and pieces of information, which is why she can't defend what she says. When she said steel can't melt, she meant there is no way the steel beams could have melted by the fire caused from the jet fuel or burning furniture. It is impossible, since that type of fire can't reach the melting point for steel.

2007-05-29 16:02:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No, she is way off base. I just love it when people with no knowledge of construction start talking about stuff like this. The big claim is that fire can't melt steel. It doesn't have to, it just has to be hot enough to make it even slightly bendable and the building comes down especially with the structural damage that was already done.

2007-05-29 16:01:34 · answer #6 · answered by Rixie 4 · 2 0

Yeah, the government blew up Building 7. After terrorists blew up the WTC.

They thought that building out there by itself was an eyesore.

No wait. The government blew up the WTC to start a global war on terrorism. They also fired on the Pentagon with a missile and made it seem as though it was another plane. And that plane that crashed in PA was not real; it was their feeble attempt to dupe us, the intelligent masses.

And meanwhile, the cover-up of this magnitude continues. What good cover-uppers they are!!!

The post below me is serious. I am not. In case you couldn't tell. God help us.

2007-05-29 15:55:15 · answer #7 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 2 1

There's one thing for sure- there's no way it fell that quickly and perfectly (mirroring the Twin Towers' strange fall) because of debris falling on it and causing fires. I just don't believe that crap. Call me crazy, but after researching the discrepancies of 9/11, I think it's very possible that 9/11 was an inside job. Especially because of the scientific proof that simply cannot be disputed.

2007-05-29 15:58:01 · answer #8 · answered by Dash 4 · 0 1

When the twin towers collapsed, it badly damaged the first 10 floors of the building. This was the main cause of the collapse. There was also a fire that continued to weaken the structure.

2007-05-29 15:55:04 · answer #9 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 2 0

No it was not bombed. Why would anyone disregard factual scientific information to believe what Rosie says. Rosie is the one that said steel can't melt, when people have been melting steel for centuries. By the way.....where is Rosie.

2007-05-29 15:50:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers