I don't.
2007-05-29 07:51:56 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
i think he should. becuase he's the king of R & B.
that is king of rape & Bawdiness
2007-05-29 08:12:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nonetheless, what he did was perverted. However you can not doubt that he is an undisputed hitmaker. Every song he puts out is a hit! From Bump N' Grind", "I Believe I can fly", "Step In The Name Of Love", "Trapped In The Closet
" and "Im A Flirt". All of those songs and more were his! So although a pedafile, he is a very good musician.
2007-05-29 08:04:24 · answer #2 · answered by MSW2010 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely no. Molesting young people is a sick and wrong thing to do, and because he did that means he doesn't deserve the title.
2007-05-29 07:57:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't even like R. Kelly's music.
so I wouldn't put that against him being crowned.
I don't think he deserves it because i personally think
his music sucks!
2007-05-29 07:56:04 · answer #4 · answered by DJ 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Naw I sure don't.
But still he makes good music.. &&
i spose he was like the first great male of rnb
so the crown is what he deserves riite??
Anyways its a split decision .. but maby his priivate life shouldnt be on a par with the music he makes..
2007-05-29 07:58:35 · answer #5 · answered by mariah 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He molested teens??? Eww i did not know that, even though he did that he still is a good singer so im split its a yes and no
2007-05-29 07:55:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO! While I respect his TALENT, I despise him personally. Also compare it to other awards, Pete Rose is not in hall of fame because of betting on baseball, who in world thought that R.Kelly should be crowned king anyway?!?!?!
2007-05-29 07:58:26 · answer #7 · answered by jpnkc74 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I do, I don't think that what happened in his past ahs anything to do with his title. He has given us many hits and proved to us through the years that he is indeed the KING OF R&B
2007-05-29 07:58:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, he should be crowned with molesting and peeing on girls. His nasty @ss needs to stay in jail forever.
2007-05-29 07:55:26 · answer #9 · answered by sleepy 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
what was he being crowned for ? molesting if so hellll nooo.if for his R&B hell yessssssss. he was crowned on his singing and he is a dammmmm good singer. i will repeat myself hellll yesssssss.
2007-05-29 08:05:19 · answer #10 · answered by daydreamer_bgi 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
even if he didn't molest those teens he shouldn't be crowned cuz he hella sux!
hes ugly and he thinks he all bad!
>=[
2007-05-29 07:54:55 · answer #11 · answered by moochi5 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋