English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
8

.....are revolutionist reclassified as terrorist in this politically correct society?

2007-05-29 06:56:54 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

They can be,just read the patriot act and as History teaches us power will always protect itself by all means necessary.
Making it easier for the government to initiate surveillance and wiretapping of U.S. citizens under the authority of the shadowy, top-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. (Sections 101, 102 and 107)
Permitting the government, under certain circumstances, to bypass the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court altogether and conduct warrantless wiretaps and searches. (Sections 103 and 104)
Sheltering federal agents engaged in illegal surveillance without a court order from criminal prosecution if they are following orders of high Executive Branch officials. (Section 106)
Creating a new category of "domestic security surveillance" that permits electronic eavesdropping of entirely domestic activity under looser standards than are provided for ordinary criminal surveillance under Title III. (Section 122)
Using an overbroad definition of terrorism that could cover some protest tactics such as those used by Operation Rescue or protesters at Vieques Island, Puerto Rico as a new predicate for criminal wiretapping and other electronic surveillance. (Sections 120 and 121)
Providing for general surveillance orders covering multiple functions of high tech devices, and by further expanding pen register and trap and trace authority for intelligence surveillance of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents. (Sections 107 and 124)
Creating a new, separate crime of using encryption technology that could add five years to any sentence for crimes committed with a computer. (Section 404)
Expanding nationwide search warrants so they do not have to meet even the broad definition of terrorism in the USA PATRIOT Act. (Section 125)
Giving the government secret access to credit reports without consent and without judicial process. (Section 126)
Enhancing the government's ability to obtain sensitive information without prior judicial approval by creating administrative subpoenas and providing new penalties for failure to comply with written demands for records. (Sections 128 and 129)
Allowing for the sampling and cataloguing of innocent Americans' genetic information without court order and without consent. (Sections 301-306)
Permitting, without any connection to anti-terrorism efforts, sensitive personal information about U.S. citizens to be shared with local and state law enforcement. (Section 311)
Terminating court-approved limits on police spying, which were initially put in place to prevent McCarthy-style law enforcement persecution based on political or religious affiliation. (Section 312)
Permitting searches, wiretaps and surveillance of United States citizens on behalf of foreign governments - including dictatorships and human rights abusers - in the absence of Senate-approved treaties. (Sections 321-22)

2007-05-29 07:03:20 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1 0

My well-known of the three is the unique, so-stated as B-area ( it grow to be greater accurately a 'double A' single) to "whats up Jude". the different 2, on the White Album, are interesting. The sluggish one is somewhat like the fore-runner to the unplugged sessions that have been so common with many musicians interior the 1890s. the different Beatles, somewhat Paul, interestingly weren't that enthused approximately "Revolution 9" making the in basic terms precise shrink for the White Album, yet John held his floor and insisted on its inclusion.

2016-12-30 06:03:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That depends on who's classifying them. The difference between a freedom fighter and a revolutionary is who's writing. However, terrorist (outside the press) means someone who's attacking the civilian population isntead of military and governmental targets, with the intent of terrorizing the people into following htem.

2007-05-29 07:01:00 · answer #3 · answered by John 4 · 2 0

You can be a revolutionary and non-violent too. There's more than one kind of revolution, like a revolution in thought, or science. A terrorist uses violent means to achieve an end, and is not necessarily a revolutionary - they might be a counter-revolutionary. Al Queda wants to go backwards in time, not forward.

2007-05-29 07:00:33 · answer #4 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 2 0

Revolution in a peaceful fashion. Vote out the traitors in washington dc. Both parties.

2007-05-29 07:04:02 · answer #5 · answered by jeb black 5 · 1 0

Sure. Domestic terrorism is what they call it, right?

2007-05-29 07:00:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Only if they lose

2007-05-29 07:00:01 · answer #7 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers