Too often that's sadly the case.In theory human rights are for everyone,every human being on the planet but the reality is that too many people still don't live in freedom or are even guaranteed their basic human rights.
But even in the free West poor people have a much harder time to get the rights they are entitled too.
I believe human, rights for all is one of the mayor requirements to in the long run ever have world peace.That's why I support Amnesty International,an organization that promotes human rights globally without bias.They spoke out strongly against the Taliban or Saudi Arabia but also don't keep quiet about the human rights violations in Europe and or America
2007-05-29 06:26:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you have ever been poor and a US Citizen, you will realize that neither the government, nor most others, care about Human rights at all unless it means that they can get their names in the paper, raise money for something (where usually less than 10% goes to the true beneficiaries and 90% goes to support those who are raising the money and making the noise). We've tried to get people help from the March of Dimes and Cerebral Palsy people and even the Red Cross and it's easier to just adopt the people and do it yourself. Illegal immigrants are big money makers for people -- corporations, politicians, illegal immigrants support groups etc. just as the blacks were back in the 50s, 60s, and 70s. In reality, you'll find that these people are just being used by the groups. Yes, there are "poster children" and "poster illegal immigrants" but when it comes to the majority, they are still poor and without help, just like the poor whites who come from the wrong side of the tracks or the blacks who live in the ghettos. Human Rights is just a banner to get publicity and money. If you don't believe it, go to Appalachia and see how many people are still living without running water and still have outhouses. Go to the ghettos and see how many people don't have heat or power or working plumbing. Look around your neighborhood. How many "boomerang kids" have moved back in with their parents because they aren't being paid a living wage? How many have moved back with their parents because they've lost their jobs to illegal aliens? How many have moved back in with their parents because they've been called up to serve in Iraq or Afghanistan and they need "babysitters" and caretakers? We have about 30 in our neighborhood alone, some of whom have brought their children with them. We can hide our heads in the sand for awhile, but the truth always comes out. It will again. Until the people decide they've had enough.......
2007-05-29 06:32:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mindbender 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is the other way. Human Rights Commission is the only forum in India which is being dreaded by most powerful
politicians and police alike as it can question all irregularities and violations made by any .
Generally it is being headed by retired judiciary luminaries or personalities from other fields with clean past record.They are vested with legal powers to straighten records and redress the injustice done to the poor.
2007-05-29 10:16:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by cqm 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It does seems, most of the time, to be the case that Human Rights are given only to the rich and powerful! *sm*
2007-05-29 06:32:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by LadyZania 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Throwing the Republicans out has finished no good, the place is the impeachment? How long will it take human beings to attain that the only distinction between a democrat and a republican is that a democrat robs from Peter to bribe Paul and a republican robs from Paul to bribe Peter. Now one candidate you're able to desire to examine out is Ron Paul. He has never voted to strengthen taxes. He has never voted for an unbalanced funds. He has never voted for a federal limit on gun possession. He has never voted to strengthen congressional pay. He has never taken a central authority-paid junket. He has never voted to strengthen the flexibility of the administrative branch. He voted against the Patriot Act. He voted against regulating the information superhighway. He voted against the Iraq conflict. He does not take part in the rewarding congressional pension software. He returns a element to his annual congressional workplace funds to the U.S. treasury each and every twelve months. Congressman Paul introduces multiple products of important law each and each twelve months, in all probability greater advantageous than any single member of Congress.
2016-10-30 02:33:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both the rich and powerful.
2007-05-29 06:20:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by www.askaman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
rich
2007-05-29 06:26:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Agent P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know what they say,"money talks and you know what walks!" Poor people always get the raw deal!!
2007-05-29 06:25:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Marilyn T 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
spellcheck bub.
2007-05-29 06:20:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋