he is better then hillary
2007-05-29 05:59:10 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He has my vote
PS he pays for his own haircuts so I don't care what the cost---ambulance chaser? I 'd bet my life you'd be running for a lawyer if you thought yo were wronged
Laura Bush had a $700 hair do the American public paid for !!!
2007-05-29 06:01:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Hillary will win the nomination... she'll pick Richardson as her vp.
Edwards is as inexperienced as Clinton and changes his position just as fast as she does. His one benefit to the party is that Hillary represents the north and Edwards the south. but he and Hillary hate each other so he will not be on a ticket with her.
2007-05-29 13:08:13 · answer #2 · answered by Jester 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he is a slime ball. he desecrated Memorial Day.
Memorial Day, a hallowed day that should be about honoring the more than one million men and women who died in the service of this nation in wars and conflicts dating back to 1775. It should be above politics. Period.
Yet one presidential candidate has blatantly violated the sanctity of this most special day. I recently received an e-mail from a group called "Supportthetroopsendthewar.com." It included a video of former Sen. John Edwards. He calls on Americans to use Memorial Day weekend as a time to "bring an end to this war."
Shockingly, the video is titled "A Memorial Day Message from John Edwards," with the smoking gun note, "Paid for by John Edwards for President." Moreover, the e-mail recommends that Americans bring signs with the message "Support the troops, End the War" to local Memorial Day parades.
Revolting is a kind word for it. It's as inappropriate as a political bumper sticker on an Arlington headstone.
Edwards is hardly the first politician from either political party to exploit this day, a holiday that was consecrated with the blood of American heroes. But the e-mail makes me sick nonetheless. It needs to stop.
The families of those killed in war should not be led to believe that their loved ones died for a less-than-worthy cause. They died because they took an oath to defend this nation and its Constitution. The sacrifice is the same whether it's for a "popular war" or an unpopular one.
Memorial Day should be an occasion to bring Americans together to honor these heroes. It brings to mind the words of Army Sergeant First Class Jack Robison, who recently wrote from Iraq, "Sometimes I think God must be creating an elite unit in heaven, because He only seems to select the very best soldiers to bring home early."
2007-05-29 13:19:38 · answer #3 · answered by ganjaman415 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He might be better than Hillary because just about anybody is better than Hillary but frankly I don't think he could be elected the head noodle of a bunch of wet noodles.
2007-05-29 13:22:47 · answer #4 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 - No.
2 - Much as I detest Queen Hillary the Great ol' Johnnie Boy is an even worse candidate. A pox on both their houses, I say!
2007-05-29 13:08:44 · answer #5 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Breck Girl has no chance. He runs to get more money. He'll quit before he has to spend it. And no he isn't better or worse than Hillary. But he is the Pretty One!
2007-05-29 13:14:32 · answer #6 · answered by Zee HatMan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better than Hillary, Yes, a chance no. 1st, How many 2cd time runners have won, and also, he only says what he thinks we want to hear. I haven't heard one thing that he is for that the people are not for. I want a president with a back bone.
2007-05-29 13:08:18 · answer #7 · answered by Common Sense 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE!!!!!!!!!
"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - June 28, 2004, in San Francisco at a Democrat Party fundraiser)
"I want to take those profits and put them into an alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 2, 2007, at DNC Winter Meeting - regarding profits earned by oil companies, which are not [yet] owned by the government)
"As president I know I can't kill, jail or occupy every nation we don't agree with and I cannot just wish that all the terrorists be wiped off the face of the Earth" (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 10, 2007, at a campaign appearance in New Hampshire)
"We're going to change the way we finance the system by taking away money from people who are doing well now" — (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton — March 24, 2007, at a health care forum in Las Vegas)
2007-05-29 13:03:20 · answer #8 · answered by and socialism 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
He is a nice guy and I don't want to rain on your parade, but he is not qualified to be President. Hillary's experience will dust all of them in the debates.
2007-05-29 13:13:15 · answer #9 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I truly don't believe that Edwards stands much of a chance. Any candidate out there is better than Hillary.
2007-05-29 13:02:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
John Edwards loses ground in the real world every day. He keeps putting his foot in his mouth....almost as bad as Kerry did......Did you know that The Breck Girl said he was uncomfortable around gays ??? Gasp !!!!!.......and then their his "carbon hypocrisy" almost rivaling Gore`s.......Edwards has no chance. That is the cold hard truth.
2007-05-29 13:11:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋