2007-05-29 05:19:14 · 11 answers · asked by soccermanico 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Believeing is not an issue. The only facts there are proves that humans did go to the moon. There is no proof to the contrary. So I know the moon landings were real.
2007-05-29 05:31:09 · answer #1 · answered by DrAnders_pHd 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It is not and has never been a matter of belief. There is an absolutely vast amount of supporting evidence for the Moon landings, and every last bit of it supports the reality of a series of lunar landings. Those who insist it is faked a) don't understand basic science, b) haven't even looked at most of the Apollo record, c) are usually motivated by money or a desire to attack the government, so are anything but objective, and d) have no critical argument skills and wouldn't recognise logic if it smacked them round the head with a wet fish.
There is not one single piece of evidence, not one, for anyhting other than the manned missions described taking place. Conspiracy theorists think all they have to do is point out flaws in the official story and suddenly a conspiracy becomes true by default. Even if they could poke decent holes in the official story (they can't) that is still flawed reasoning.
2007-05-29 21:22:31 · answer #2 · answered by Jason T 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well if it hadn't been so..........Dan Brown would have made a novel on it and it would be much better than DECEPTION POINT!!!!
But the point is "I believe that man landed on the moon in 1969".....thats because they have solid proofs.
To refute all of this as a big hoax has to imply that its the biggest fraud ever not only by US, but since research has been carried out by other countries too.
2007-05-29 05:24:13 · answer #3 · answered by Som™ 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If you ever get a chance to see CBS live coverage on type think you will be convinced, because reactions by people were too good to be acted. Why would Russia not expose any fake job.
Was in exhibit when newspapers wanted to photo of moon soil encased in block, so got to hold piece of the moon. For all I know it could have been anything, but scientist that study soil would have known if sample came from Earth.
2007-05-29 06:25:40 · answer #4 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well apparently I have seen the rocks and spoken with Harrison Schmidt. So I might as well believe it. It doesn't affect my life either way though.
2007-05-29 05:22:35 · answer #5 · answered by Lady Geologist 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm old. I've seen on TV. Of course it could have been a fake but in that case images would have been better.
But, yes, after so many years of pause it really looks like a legend.
2007-05-29 05:36:24 · answer #6 · answered by Serban 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Disputing history is a lame excuse for not learning it.
2007-05-29 06:31:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of couse -- did Columbus cross the ocean ?
2007-05-29 05:37:40 · answer #8 · answered by Gene 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I go beyond just believing -- I KNOW it happened.
2007-05-29 07:37:06 · answer #9 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes why not
2007-05-29 10:07:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋