English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Pretty simple, he nationalized or took control of the farms in the country. He made people work the lands and did not allow for any free forms of speech. If you disobeyed, you were killed or put in jail. In command communism, everything for the country and no privacy is allowed.

2007-05-29 05:21:54 · answer #1 · answered by onj21 3 · 0 0

Soviet Command Economy

2016-10-31 21:04:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In a market economy, there are very few, if any, price controls. In a command economy, all prices are set by the government (in the USSR, there was a special government agency, the State Committee for Prices, that did nothing but set prices for everything).

In a market economy, the majority of population works in privately owned businesses. In the USSR, private ownership of business enterprises was severely limited. Initially, it was tolerated in service industries and agriculture (on the premise that people should be allowed to work for themselves as long as they don't hire others to work for them), but eventually, even that was stamped out and private enterprise became a crime punishable by imprisonment. Every conceivable enterprise, from steel mills to shoe stores, became government property.

2007-05-29 05:39:56 · answer #3 · answered by NC 7 · 0 0

You even put the number 7 from the page on your homework assignment on there. Nice touch.

2007-05-29 05:15:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the answer is Stalin.

2007-05-29 05:15:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers