Have you noticed cons have become increasingly paranoid?

Question

Not only will they not believe the mainstream media, historians, economists, universities, academia, courts, and polling companies, etc, etc,

but now they won't even believe well established government organizations like the Department of Treasury or scientific organizations like the American Meterology Society. Only the right-wing pundits "tell it like it is".

BELOW ARE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS OF WELL ESTABLISHED SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS ON MADE MADE GLOBAL WARMING.

WATCH THE CONS RESPOND WITH EDITORIALS FROM POLITICAL WEBSITES, YOUTUBE VIDEOS, AND CUT AND PASTE FROM WIKIPIEDIA ARTICLES.
===============================================

1) THE AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, FOUNDED IN 1919, OVER 45,000 MEMBERS
"Human activities are increasingly altering the Earth's climate. These effects add to natural influences that have been present over Earth's history. Scientific evidence strongly indicates that natural influences cannot explain the rapid increase in global near-surface temperatures observed during the second half of the 20th century.
http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/climate_change_position.html

2) THE U.S. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE (ALONG WITH THE NAS OF THE G8 NATIONS), FOUNDED IN 1863, OVER 2,000 MEMBERS, OVER 200 NOBEL PRIZE MEMBERS
"There is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities. The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action.
http://www.academie-sciences.fr/actualites/textes/G8_gb.pdf

3) THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, FOUNDED IN 1888, OVER 20,500 MEMBERS
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) supports the scientific conclusions that Earth’s climate is changing; the climate changes are due in part to human activities; and the probable consequences of the climate changes will be significant and blind to geopolitical boundaries.
http://www.geosociety.org/aboutus/position10.htm

4) THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, FOUNDED IN 1876, OVER 160,000 MEMBERS
"There is now general agreement among scientific experts that the recent warming trend is real (and particularly strong within the past 20 years), that most of the observed warming is likely due to increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, and that climate change could have serious adverse effects by the end of this century."
http://www.chemistry.org/portal/resources/ACS/ACSContent/government/statements/2004_statements/2004_07_global_climate_chg_env.pdf

5) THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGY SOCIETY, FOUNDED IN 1919, OVER 11,000 MEMBERS
"Despite the uncertainties noted above, there is adequate evidence from observations and interpretations of climate simulations to conclude that the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; that humans have significantly contributed to this change; and that further climate change will continue to have important impacts on human societies, on economies, on ecosystems, and on wildlife through the 21st century and beyond."
http://www.ametsoc.org/POLICY/2007climatechange.html

6) THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE, CREATED IN 1988, HUNDREDS OF SCIENTISTS FROM OVER 130 NATIONS
"Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely (defined in footnotes as greater then 90% likelyhood) due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations. Discernible human influences now extend to other aspects of climate, including ocean warming, continental-average temperatures, temperature extremes and wind patterns"
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

7) THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, FOUNDED IN 1848, SERVES 262 AFFILIATED SOCIETIES AND ACADEMIES OF SCIENCE FOR A TOTAL OF 10 MILLION INDIVIDUALS
"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society. Accumulating data from across the globe reveal a wide array of effects: rapidly melting glaciers, destabilization of major ice sheets, increases in extreme weather, rising sea level, shifts in species ranges, and more. The pace of change and the evidence of harm have increased markedly over the last five years. The time to control greenhouse gas emissions is now."
http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change/mtg_200702/aaas_climate_statement.pdf

8) THE NOAA'S NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER PALEOCLIMATOLOGY PROGRAM, FOUNDED IN 1992, HAS THE LARGEST ARCHIVE OF CLIMATE AND PALEOCLIMATE DATA
"Many scientists have now concluded that global warming can be explained by a human-caused enhancement of the greenhouse effect. It is important to remember both that the greenhouse effect occurs naturally, and that it has been intensified by humankind's input of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere."
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/what.html

9) THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, FOUNDED IN 1960, OVER 120 MEMBERS, SERVES OVER 62 PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS INCLUDING UNIVERSITIES AND RESEARCH CENTERS
"Together, these data show that Earth's surface air temperature has risen more than 1.1°F (0.7°C) since the late 1800s. This warming of the average temperature around the globe has been especially sharp since the 1970s. Global models at NCAR have simulated 20th century climate and found three main factors at work:
1) Solar activity contributed to a warming trend in global average temperature from the 1910s through 1930s.
2) As industrial activity increased following World War II, sun-blocking sulfates and other aerosol emissions helped lead to a slight global cooling from the 1940s to 1970s.
3) Since 1980, the rise in greenhouse gas emissions from human activity has overwhelmed the aerosol effect to produce overall global warming."
http://www.ucar.edu/research/climate/warming.jsp

10) THE NASA'S GODDARD INSTITUTE FOR SPACE STUDIES, FOUNDED IN 1961, SPECIALIZES IN SPACECRAFT OBSERVATIONS AND GLOBAL CLIMATE MODELS
"A new NASA-funded study used a computer climate model to simulate the last 50 years of climate changes, projects warming over the next 50 years regardless of whether or not nations curb their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions soon. If no emission reductions are made and they continue to increase at the current rate, global temperatures may increase by 1-2º Celsius (1.8º-3.6º Fahrenheit). But if the growth rate of carbon dioxide does not exceed its current rate and if the growth of true air pollutants (things that are harmful to human health) is reversed, temperatures may rise by only 0.75C (1.35F)."
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20020919/

Answer 1

This is a challenge to all Yahoo! Answers users. What you've been spoon fed by the media regarding global warming is a massive hoax.

How can global warming proponents explain that, in our planet's history, the CO2 levels were sometimes 3-10 times higher than today, with no accompanying rise in temperature. How can they explain that ALL the planets in our solar system.... Mars, Jupiter, etc. are all experiencing "global warming". It's all due to increased solar radiation from the sun.
Watch this video, and then say if your opinion about the global warming theory hasn't changed.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4499562022478442170

Answer 2

It's gonna be a big case of "I TOLD YOU SO !" They are a small group of angry but ignorant people and sound like whiny little kids trying to bully everybody who don't agree with them. Why else would they use threats of violence as part of their tactic in their arguments? I'm over 50 and when was a kid, the guys that were just a little bit older were very violent and racist. Now it seems that the guys just a bit older than me,and the guys a lot younger are the ones supporting this criminal admin.! We used to call'm 'greasers' and the term still fits ! Remember...hate &predijuce only arise out of ignorance !

Answer 3

an identical human beings (alongside with some human beings democrats) concept Chavez replaced right into a dictator. You spoke back that he wasn't. especially situations you should anticipate persons to coach their genuine nature, basically as Chavez has those days. we've democrats screaming (Senator Hillary Clinton lined) that the terrific-wing conspiracy replaced into out to get them (or their husbands). basically as stupid. yet, this is critical be sure our judges are not biased, are not activists, and that the media is offering purpose products, no longer in basic terms opinion products (although unfastened industry ought to settle in this. government ought to easily be sure the products are categorised appropriate, like foodstuff interior the keep).

Answer 4

Economists and Treasury Dept? Actually usually they're on the opposite side of the fence from the mainstream media.

Like, on the issue of tax rates and tax revenue......

Answer 5

Yes

Some are trying to hide under a Donna Reed Hair Doo.

Go Team Bush Go

Answer 6

Well I don't know many or ANY cons screaming about conspiracy theories...
so No I haven't noticed this paranoia you speak of.

Answer 7

Well said. However the "cons" you are referring too are the wannabe neoconservatives. Not only are they not conservative, they are bush lapdogs and embarrass themselves daily. The Neoconservative experiment is over, and it failed. Its time for the GOP to return to TRUE conservatism.

Answer 8

Nothing, I mean NOTHING, is a conservatives fault. Every mistake is liberal. Liberals are all unemployed, stupid, hate god hate everything.
-sarcasm-