English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The liberal media was paying Mr. Chavez a compliment. He would have more reason for outrage if CNN likened him to President Bush and the Republicans...Liberals think Al Qaeda are just people like you and me...mothers and fathers...blah, blah, blah


http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200705/s1936930.htm

Venezuela says it will file charges against US cable network CNN for linking President Hugo Chavez to Al Qaeda.

Information Minister William Lara has presented what he says is CNN footage displaying pictures of Mr Chavez juxtaposed with those of an Al Qaeda leader.

2007-05-29 04:44:15 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

I find that to be hilarious. Hugo and his socialist posse suing CNN the socialists friend. Don't you just love when crazy and karma link up to create a twisted version of serves them right?

2007-05-29 05:49:56 · answer #1 · answered by Mother 6 · 1 3

The weatherman underground felt the government grow to be transforming into oppressive and attacked what they seen as targets that represented the oppression of the federal government. With their radical perspectives like that, i don't somewhat understand why the are seen liberal while their radical view grow to be the comparable that the NRA makes use of to shield the 2d modification from fake perceived threats to it that they convey about about themselves. i think of precise-wingers are in basic terms indignant because of the fact the climate Underground walked the walk that the NRA nuts only communicate the communicate. i'm not syaing I help their movements, yet ti looks un achieveable that they at the instant are not the NRA human beings of the century. If Ayers could have left an indication on the explosions asserting "help the 2d' or some thing, they in all possibility could be. particularly this wasn't an argument, till Republicans chanced on themselves unable to run on their records.

2016-12-30 05:55:18 · answer #2 · answered by schattenberg 3 · 0 0

Given that the last country with plenty of oil you guys falsely associated with Al Qaeda got illegally invaded I think that's fair enough.

BTW since it's again been brought up the only TV station that got prevented from renewing it's license (ie not shut down, prevented from renewing it's license) was one that encouraged armed overthrow of the government. No TV station would be allowed to do that in the US, why should Venezeula be any different?

Also only 2 of the countries stations are in fact government owned, there are actually plenty of other independent ones that haven't encouraged violent revolution against the democraticly elected (and internationally monitored including by US election monitoring groups) government. A government that was elected by a far larger margin and that is far more popular than the US government I note. Incidentally the people who replaced the democraticly elected government briefly during the 2002 coup, the ones who this supposedly wonderful TV network supported... their first action was to suspend the constitution and dismiss parliament.

2007-05-29 05:09:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Al Qaeda are people...biut not like you and me...I don;t suport war or violence as a means to solve conflict. Al Qaeda are people just like those who support using violence to solve conflicts. So your assumtion that everyone who is against war is A) liberal and B) pro venezuela just doesn;t wash...and if you honestly believe that half of america (the half DEMANDING for bin laden's head, not the other half who let him go on July 4 of last year) then it is no wonder you do not understand.

2007-05-29 04:57:16 · answer #4 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2 2

Damn liberal media, trying to make Chavez, a left-winger look bad.

What's next? Spending weeks on the Dean scream ultimately costing him the nomination or a year on the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal?

2007-05-29 04:53:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Mr. Chavez is the next Castro in our hemisphere. He has nationalized the media, shut down the last TV station that was dissenting, and is about to nationalize the oil industry.

Yet some of us (not me) think it's cute when Chavez kicks the USA in the shins like a small bully child.

Chavez needs to be spanked and hard...

2007-05-29 04:49:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

As a liberal I can tell you we do not equate Al Qeada to a good thing. Terror is something we are going to have to deal with for a very long time, it's going to be a bigger deal than the Cold War was.

Sometimes I think the real internal terrorists are the ones that really create a divide such as this.

2007-05-29 04:49:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

My opinion, the CIA should put a bullet through Chavez's head, and be done with him, he's a nasty little thug, who is so filled with hate for America, and he is bending over backwards to accommodate Ahmadinejad. Yes ashes to ashes and dust to dust for Chavez, and the sooner the better.

2007-05-29 05:00:23 · answer #8 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 3 1

You have no idea what a real liberal thinks. You use innuendo and supposition to support your feeble argument. I contend you get your beliefs from Fox News or the Drudge Report as some balanced form of information. You are no more than a stooge for the wacko right wing. Fool.

2007-05-29 04:51:56 · answer #9 · answered by kenny J 6 · 5 4

I can understand that. No matter what your opinion of him is, he's not a monolithic thinker. By definition, as a marxist.

2007-05-29 04:54:21 · answer #10 · answered by Wonka 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers