English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

said No way>>>>>

2007-05-29 02:15:07 · 10 answers · asked by ThorGirl 4 in Politics & Government Politics

try Facts next time, NEXT!!!!!!!!



Judge Rejects Saudi Terrorist Link
Suit Claimed Members of Royal Family Funded 9/11 Attackers

By Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, November 15, 2003; Page A16

Plaintiffs in a massive lawsuit against Saudi leaders have not provided compelling evidence that individual members of the Saudi royal family knowingly funded al Qaeda's Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, a federal judge ruled yesterday as he dismissed the victims' claims against two of the desert kingdom's princes.

The $1 trillion lawsuit, filed by more than 900 victims' family members and some injured firefighters and rescue workers, argued that several Saudi leaders and investment organizations helped fund the terrorist attacks and should be held responsible.



Prince Turki al-Faisal allegedly took part in a deal with Osama bin Laden.

_____News From Saudi Arabia_____

•They charged that Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz, as Saudi defense min

2007-05-29 02:19:11 · update #1

osama bin limbaugh is a YA guy NOT el rushbo

2007-05-29 02:20:22 · update #2

10 answers

Proven fact, so do some research next time before you troll.

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/11/23/saudi.fbi.911/

Your "fearless leader" is more to blame than Reagan, Bush Sr., and Slick Willy in this mess. Reagan, Bush Sr. and Clinton all had opportunities to nip bin Laden's terror group in the bud, but chose not to.
The Shrub is the one that had Al Qaeda's main supporters and funding source, the Saudi royal family, shipped out of the U.S. on 9/11 just after the attacks.

He's the biggest traitor in U.S. history for aiding and abbeting terrorists.

2007-05-29 02:28:08 · answer #1 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 0 0

Most people here are really ignorant. Bin laden himself come from a very wealthy family ($billions n billions)
Bin Landen may have been funded by the royal family but it wasn't for the reasons to destroy westerners, etc. Bin laden was funded by the US (CIA) through Saudi Arabia in order to combat the Russians in Afghanstan during the Afghan-Russian war.
It is common knowledge here in EU that serveral US made surface to Air missles where given to him and his men to drop Russian Helicopters.
After the Bin laden he became radiclarised and started fighting against the US.
However the US is not all that good because they have done they're share of bad things, we can go on on but thats the story.
Bin laden may have a good cause but he is just too extreme, and if you don't realise it, not a lot of muslims really like him. That's why you see most of US spys in the middle eas are of middle-eastern backgrounds. Maybe those are the ones you here when "an iraq has been beheaded"
That will be the same if a neo-nazi person came from a really really family.

2007-05-29 09:49:12 · answer #2 · answered by Richard 1 · 0 0

Oh, OK, I thought you were saying Rush himself made this claim? I know Mikail Moore would have us swallow that tripe, but not Mr. Limbaugh.

Heck, if they could prove anything, then I would agree with the families, but they can't, so it is all just guessing and kind of smacks of going after the guy with the biggest wallet - Saudi Arabia, of course.

Whatever happened to the good ol' days when the Saudis were the funny rich guys in Cannonball Run anyway?

2007-05-29 09:33:45 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfgang92 4 · 0 0

There are federal and state judges, but there is no such thing as a Clinton judge. Rush Limbaugh and Osama Bin Laden are different people.

2007-05-29 09:20:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 4 0

Sorry to disagree, but Saudi Arabia, is the Home of Wahhabi
Islam, which seeks to Destroy western Civilization.

2007-05-29 09:20:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Personal attacks are not nice. Try wording it without pointing fingers at a particular poster. You should be above such pettiness.

2007-05-29 09:23:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Please provide a link to prove your claim of this statment. I'm no fan of Rush Limbaugh, but I still want proof that he said this or I'm just making comment on "hearsay".

2007-05-29 09:18:36 · answer #7 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 3 1

I refuse to answer, on the grounds that it may incriminate me.

2007-05-29 09:19:27 · answer #8 · answered by Nunya Bidniss 7 · 0 1

You're talkin about that poster. 'Cause he's smokin some strong stuff in that cigar.

2007-05-29 09:18:53 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 2 3

Rush is a JUNKIE and I don't waste time on JUNKIES!!

2007-05-29 09:20:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers